Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.
green
2 sentences1996Third, it argued that pointing to an individual company's labeling does not establish an industry standard and, under Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., 89 Wash.2d 474 , 573 P.2d 785 , 93 A.L.R.3d 86 (1978), the advertisement would be inadmissible to prove negligent failure to warn on the part of Key. 1996Third, it argued that pointing to an individual company's labeling does not establish an industry standard and, under Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., 89 Wash.2d 474 , 573 P.2d 785 , 93 A.L.R.3d 86 (1978), the advertisement would be inadmissible to prove negligent failure to warn on the part of Key. | 3 | 1996–2025 |
Edison Electric Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency
green
2 sentences2015Thus, BP plainly overstates the risk that it could erroneously become subject to possible enforcement action. 20 No. 45609 -5 - II The Edison Electric court noted that " WET tests will be wrong some of the time, which is why EPA warned against using a single test result to institute an action for a civil penalty," but nonetheless upheld the WET testing methods against an industry challenge. 391 F. 3d at 1272 citing 67 Fed. 2015Thus, BP plainly overstates the risk that it could erroneously become subject to possible enforcement action. ¶52 The Edison Electric court noted that “WET tests will be wrong some of the time, which is why EPA warned against using a single test result to institute an action for a civil penalty,” but nonetheless upheld the WET testing methods against an industry challenge. 391 F.3d at 1272 (citing 67 Fed. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Swartley v. Seattle School District No. 1
green
2 sentences2025Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., Inc., 89 Wn.2d 474, 487 , 573 P.2d 785 (1978); Meyers v. Meyers, 81 Wn.2d 533, 537 , 503 P.2d 59 (1972); Swartley v. Seattle School District No. 1, 70 Wn.2d 17, 21 , 421 P.2d 1009 (1966). 2025Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., Inc., 89 Wn.2d 474, 487 , 573 P.2d 785 (1978); Meyers v. Meyers, 81 Wn.2d 533, 537 , 503 P.2d 59 (1972); Swartley v. Seattle School District No. 1, 70 Wn.2d 17, 21 , 421 P.2d 1009 (1966). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Meyers v. Meyers
green
2 sentences2025Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., Inc., 89 Wn.2d 474, 487 , 573 P.2d 785 (1978); Meyers v. Meyers, 81 Wn.2d 533, 537 , 503 P.2d 59 (1972); Swartley v. Seattle School District No. 1, 70 Wn.2d 17, 21 , 421 P.2d 1009 (1966). 2025Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co., Inc., 89 Wn.2d 474, 487 , 573 P.2d 785 (1978); Meyers v. Meyers, 81 Wn.2d 533, 537 , 503 P.2d 59 (1972); Swartley v. Seattle School District No. 1, 70 Wn.2d 17, 21 , 421 P.2d 1009 (1966). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Helling v. Carey
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.