Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Werneth
green
2 sentences2009Werneth, 147 Wn. 2009Werneth, 147 Wash.App. at 552 , 197 P.3d 1195 . ¶ 24 The trial court convicted the defendant of failure to register. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Wallace
green
1 sentence2026Therefore, the factual comparability analysis suffers the same infirmity as the legal comparability analysis. 2 See Wallace, 33 Cal. 4th at 749-50 . 12 No. 40921-0-III State v. Merritt C. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Williamson v. State
green
1 sentence2018Barrington simply states that a legal comparability analysis is “precluded.” Br. of Appellant at 6. “[I]f the foreign statute is broader than the Washington definition of the particular crime, ‘the sentencing court may look at the defendant’s conduct . . . to determine whether the conduct would have violated the comparable Washington statute.’” State v. Morely, 134 Wn.2d 588 , 606, 852 P.2d 167 (1998) (quoting State v. Mutch, 87 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Morley
green
1 sentence2018Barrington simply states that a legal comparability analysis is “precluded.” Br. of Appellant at 6. “[I]f the foreign statute is broader than the Washington definition of the particular crime, ‘the sentencing court may look at the defendant’s conduct . . . to determine whether the conduct would have violated the comparable Washington statute.’” State v. Morely, 134 Wn.2d 588 , 606, 852 P.2d 167 (1998) (quoting State v. Mutch, 87 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Mutch
green
2 sentences2018Barrington simply states that a legal comparability analysis is “precluded.” Br. of Appellant at 6. “[I]f the foreign statute is broader than the Washington definition of the particular crime, ‘the sentencing court may look at the defendant’s conduct . . . to determine whether the conduct would have violated the comparable Washington statute.’” State v. Morely, 134 Wn.2d 588 , 606, 852 P.2d 167 (1998) (quoting State v. Mutch, 87 Wn. 2018App. 433, 437 , 942 P.2d 1018 (1997)). 5 No. 50243-7-II II. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Olsen
green
1 sentence2015Olsen, 180 Wn.2d at 472 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Lavery
green
1 sentence2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Werneth
green
1 sentence2009Werneth, 147 Wash.App. at 552 , 197 P.3d 1195 . ¶ 24 The trial court convicted the defendant of failure to register. | 1 | 2009–2009 |