Murphy motion in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Williamsgreen wash · 1984 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020See State v. Williams, 102 Wn.2d 733, 740 , 689 P.2d 1065 (1984). 2 Mr. Murphy’s brief focuses almost entirely on whether there was an initial basis for the stop. 2020See State v. Williams, 102 Wn.2d 733, 740 , 689 P.2d 1065 (1984). 2 Mr. Murphy’s brief focuses almost entirely on whether there was an initial basis for the stop.	1	1
Dudley Warren Schilling, Cross v. J. A. Belcher, Sr., Cross Dudley Warren Schilling v. J. A. Belcher, Sr.green ca5 · 1978 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013Schilling, 582 F.2d at 996 (applying Florida law). 12 Among other things, Murphy's motion to dismiss argued: "All of Plaintiffs derivative claims on behalf of [GIS] against the Defendants must be dismissed for lack of standing because the Plaintiff is no longer a shareholder of [GIS] and [GIS] was administratively dissolved as a corporation in April of 2010.	1	1
State v. McDermondgreen washctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. Millergreen wash · 1988 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed. 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. Walshgreen wash · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed. 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. Moongreen washctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed. 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. Moongreen washctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed. 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. McDermondgreen washctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1
State v. Walshgreen wash · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed. 2003NOTES [1] State v. Walsh, 143 Wash.2d 1, 6-9 , 17 P.3d 591 (2001); see also State v. Miller, 110 Wash.2d 528, 531-35 , 756 P.2d 122 (1988). [2] State v. Moon, 108 Wash.App. 59, 63-64 , 29 P.3d 734 (2001). [3] Moon, 108 Wash.App. at 64 , 29 P.3d 734 . [4] State v. McDermond, 112 Wash.App. 239 , 47 P.3d 600 (2002). [5] Walsh, 143 Wash.2d at 8-9 , 17 P.3d 591 . [6] We note the trial court denied Murphy's motion the day before the Moon decision was filed.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Absher Const. Co. v. KENT SCHOOL DIST. green washctapp · 1996 2 sentences 2006Dist. 415, 79 Wash.App. 841, 848 , 917 P.2d 1086 (1995). ¶ 110 Most likely, the trial court reduced Murphy's fee award based on the reasons given by Taliesen in its opposition to Murphy's motion for fees and costs. 2006App. 841, 848 , 917 P.2d 1086 (1995). ¶110 Most likely, the trial court reduced Murphy’s fee award based on the reasons given by Taliesen in its opposition to Murphy’s motion for fees and costs.	2	2006–2006
Michael M. Johnson v. United States green cafc · 2003 1 sentence 2013Johnson, 317 F.3d at 1333-34 .	1	2013–2013
Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415 green washctapp · 1995 1 sentence 2006Dist. 415, 79 Wash.App. 841, 848 , 917 P.2d 1086 (1995). ¶ 110 Most likely, the trial court reduced Murphy's fee award based on the reasons given by Taliesen in its opposition to Murphy's motion for fees and costs.	1	2006–2006
Wilson v. Horsley green wash · 1999 1 sentence 2002Court Rule 15(a) states that leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” The “touchstone for the denial of a motion to amend is the prejudice such an amendment would cause to the nonmoving party.” Wilson v. Horsley, 137 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 974 P.2d 316 (1999).	1	2002–2002
Wilson v. Horsley green wash · 1999 1 sentence 2002Court Rule 15(a) states that leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” The “touchstone for the denial of a motion to amend is the prejudice such an amendment would cause to the nonmoving party.” Wilson v. Horsley, 137 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 974 P.2d 316 (1999).	1	2002–2002

Where else courts name it

MO 18 (1978–2020) FL 17 (1979–2019) CA 14 (1957–2025) TX 13 (1928–2024) GA 12 (1989–2026) NY 11 (1987–2024) VA 6 (1989–2024) OH 6 (2001–2015) WA 6 (2002–2020) NH 5 (1996–2024) OK 5 (1997–2018) MS 4 (2001–2024) IN 4 (1987–2020) MD 4 (1981–2001) IL 4 (1990–2020) ID 3 (1976–2012) PA 3 (1993–2017) NE 3 (1982–2007) LA 3 (1985–2006) SC 3 (2007–2018) KY 3 (1980–2008) DE 2 (2008–2022) OR 2 (1978–1985) NC 2 (1982–2000) MT 2 (2003–2018) AL 2 (2009–2012) DC 2 (1981–2004) MA 2 (2001–2026) AZ 2 (1991–2019) ME 2 (1975–2004) CO 2 (1993–1996) ND 2 (1913–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check