parking area exception (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

parking area exception in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Clauson v. Dept. of Labor and Industriesgreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See RCW 51.12.010 ("This title shall be liberally construed for the purpose of reducing to a minimum the suffering and economic loss arising from injuries and/or death occurring in the course of employment"); see also Clauson v. Department of Labor Indus., 130 Wash.2d 580, 584 , 925 P.2d 624 (1996) (All doubts as to the meaning of the Industrial Insurance Act are to be resolved in favor of the injured worker). [7] The decision of the Board is affirmed.

2004See RCW 51.12.010 (“This title shall be liberally construed for the purpose of reducing to a minimum the suffering and economic loss arising from injuries and/or death occurring in the course of employment”); see also Clauson v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 130 Wn.2d 580, 584 , 925 P.2d 624 (1996) (All doubts as to the meaning of the Industrial Insurance Act are to be resolved in favor of the injured worker.). 7 The decision of the Board is affirmed.

22
Clauson v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See RCW 51.12.010 ("This title shall be liberally construed for the purpose of reducing to a minimum the suffering and economic loss arising from injuries and/or death occurring in the course of employment"); see also Clauson v. Department of Labor Indus., 130 Wash.2d 580, 584 , 925 P.2d 624 (1996) (All doubts as to the meaning of the Industrial Insurance Act are to be resolved in favor of the injured worker). [7] The decision of the Board is affirmed.

2004See RCW 51.12.010 (“This title shall be liberally construed for the purpose of reducing to a minimum the suffering and economic loss arising from injuries and/or death occurring in the course of employment”); see also Clauson v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 130 Wn.2d 580, 584 , 925 P.2d 624 (1996) (All doubts as to the meaning of the Industrial Insurance Act are to be resolved in favor of the injured worker.). 7 The decision of the Board is affirmed.

22
Boeing Co. v. Rooneygreen
washctapp · 2000 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2002–2004
2 sentences

2004Rooney at 418, 10 P.3d 423 .

2002Boeing Co. v. Rooney, 102 Wash.App. 414, 418 , 10 P.3d 423 (2000).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Boeing Co. v. Rooney green
washctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2004Rooney 102 Wn.

2002Boeing Co. v. Rooney, 102 Wn.

32002–2004
Hamilton v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1969
2 sentences

2014Thus, under Olson , Dillon’s injuries were not sustained in a jobsite and are not exempt from the parking area exception. ¶19 Dillon contends that even if she was injured in a parking area that was not part of her jobsite, she is en titled to recover under the Act because she was injured on a “hazardous route” within the meaning of Hamilton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 77 Wn.2d 355, 363 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969).

2014Thus, under Olson , Dillon’s injuries were not sustained in a jobsite and are not exempt from the parking area exception. ¶19 Dillon contends that even if she was injured in a parking area that was not part of her jobsite, she is en titled to recover under the Act because she was injured on a “hazardous route” within the meaning of Hamilton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 77 Wn.2d 355, 363 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969).

22014–2014

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.08.013 (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.52.130 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check