Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.green2 sentences2017Havens v. C&D Plastics, Inc., 124 Wn.2d 158, 182 , 876 P.2d 435 (1994) (citation omitted). 2017Havens v. C&D Plastics, Inc., 124 Wn.2d 158, 182 , 876 P.2d 435 (1994) (citation omitted). | 2 | 5 |
Stiley v. Blockgreen2 sentences2002Id. at 182 ; see also Stiley v. Block, 130 Wn.2d 486, 505-06 , 925 P.2d 194 (1996) (promises of future performance are not representations of existing fact). 2002Id. at 182 , 876 P.2d 435 ; see also Stiley v. Block, 130 Wash.2d 486, 505-06 , 925 P.2d 194 (1996) (promises of future performance are not representations of existing fact). | 2 | 2 |
Stiley v. Blockgreen2 sentences2002Id. at 182 ; see also Stiley v. Block, 130 Wn.2d 486, 505-06 , 925 P.2d 194 (1996) (promises of future performance are not representations of existing fact). 2002Id. at 182 , 876 P.2d 435 ; see also Stiley v. Block, 130 Wash.2d 486, 505-06 , 925 P.2d 194 (1996) (promises of future performance are not representations of existing fact). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Donatelli v. D.R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017It is black letter law that "a false representation as to a presently existing fact is a prerequisite to a misrepresentation claim."32 Thus "a false promise does not constitute [representation of] an existing fact."33 The supreme court has explained that "a representation that something will be done in the future, or a promise to do it, from its nature cannot be true or false at the time when it is made."34 "Where the fulfillment or satisfaction of the thing represented depends upon a promised performance of a future act, or upon the occurrence of a future event, or upon particular future use, 2017It is black letter law that "a false representation as to a presently existing fact is a prerequisite to a misrepresentation claim."32 Thus "a false promise does not constitute [representation of] an existing fact."33 The supreme court has explained that "a representation that something will be done in the future, or a promise to do it, from its nature cannot be true or false at the time when it is made."34 "Where the fulfillment or satisfaction of the thing represented depends upon a promised performance of a future act, or upon the occurrence of a future event, or upon particular future use, | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. King County
green
1 sentence2017Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. King County, 112 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.