Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King County v. Washington State Boundary Review Boardgreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., King Cy. v. State Boundary Review Bd., 122 Wn.2d 648, 672-73 , 860 P.2d 1024 (1993); Fisher v. Employment Sec. 1994See, e.g., King Cy. v. State Boundary Review Bd., 122 Wn.2d 648, 672-73 , 860 P.2d 1024 (1993); Fisher v. Employment Sec. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon "'a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.'" Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wash.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). 2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon “ ‘a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.’ ”Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wn.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wn.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Stranger Creek
green
2 sentences2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon “ ‘a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.’ ”Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wn.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wn.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). 2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon “ ‘a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.’ ”Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wn.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wn.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon "'a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.'" Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wash.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). 2006Under the doctrine of stare decisis, this court will abandon a previously established rule only upon “ ‘a clear showing that [the] rule is incorrect and harmful.’ ”Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc., 152 Wn.2d 138, 147 , 94 P.3d 930 (2004) (quoting In re Rights to Waters of Stranger Creek, 77 Wn.2d 649, 653 , 466 P.2d 508 (1970)). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
United States v. Halper
red
2 sentences1998The Court disavowed the method of analysis used in Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , and reaffirmed the previously established rule exemplified in Ward, 448 U.S. 242 . 1998The Court disavowed the method of analysis used in Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , and reaffirmed the previously established rule exemplified in Ward, 448 U.S. 242 , 100 S.Ct. 2636 . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Hudson v. United States
green
2 sentences1998Hudson, 522 U.S. at 96 . 1998Hudson , ___ U.S. at ___, 118 S.Ct. at 491 . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
United States v. Ward
green
2 sentences1998The Court disavowed the method of analysis used in Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , and reaffirmed the previously established rule exemplified in Ward, 448 U.S. 242 . 1998The Court disavowed the method of analysis used in Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , and reaffirmed the previously established rule exemplified in Ward, 448 U.S. 242 , 100 S.Ct. 2636 . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Otton
green
2 sentences2017State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673, 678 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016); Int'! 2017State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673, 678 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016); Int'! | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.