Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
January v. Portergreen2 sentences2018Parole and ERT are different concepts and subject to different laws. ¶ 36 "[P]arole is not a right but a mere privilege conferred as an act of grace by the state through its own administrative agency." January v. Porter , 75 Wash.2d 768 ,774, 453 P.2d 876 (1969). 2018Parole and ERT are different concepts and subject to different laws. ¶ 36 "[P]arole is not a right but a mere privilege conferred as an act of grace by the state through its own administrative agency." January v. Porter , 75 Wash.2d 768 ,774, 453 P.2d 876 (1969). | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Personal Restraint of Ayers
green
2 sentences1999The parole determination... may be made `for a variety of reasons and often involve[s] no more than informed predictions as to what would best serve [correctional purposes] or the safety and welfare of the inmate.' The decision turns on a `discretionary assessment of a multiplicity of imponderables, entailing primarily what a man is and what he may become rather than simply what he has done.'" Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) (alterations in original) (citations omitted); Ayers, 105 Wash.2d at 165-66 , 1999The parole determination... may be made `for a variety of reasons and often involve[s] no more than informed predictions as to what would best serve [correctional purposes] or the safety and welfare of the inmate.' The decision turns on a `discretionary assessment of a multiplicity of imponderables, entailing primarily what a man is and what he may become rather than simply what he has done.'" Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) (alterations in original) (citations omitted); Ayers, 105 Wash.2d at 165-66 , | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex
green
2 sentences1999The parole determination... may be made `for a variety of reasons and often involve[s] no more than informed predictions as to what would best serve [correctional purposes] or the safety and welfare of the inmate.' The decision turns on a `discretionary assessment of a multiplicity of imponderables, entailing primarily what a man is and what he may become rather than simply what he has done.'" Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) (alterations in original) (citations omitted); Ayers, 105 Wash.2d at 165-66 , 1999The parole determination... may be made `for a variety of reasons and often involve[s] no more than informed predictions as to what would best serve [correctional purposes] or the safety and welfare of the inmate.' The decision turns on a `discretionary assessment of a multiplicity of imponderables, entailing primarily what a man is and what he may become rather than simply what he has done.'" Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) (alterations in original) (citations omitted); Ayers, 105 Wash.2d at 165-66 , | 1 | 1999–1999 |
In Re Pierce v. Smith
green
2 sentences1969Pierce v. Smith, 31 Wn.2d 52 , 195 P.2d 112 (1948), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 834 , 93 L. 1969Pierce v. Smith, 31 Wn.2d 52 , 195 P.2d 112 (1948), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 834 , 93 L. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Sanner v. Maryland
green
1 sentence1969Pierce v. Smith, 31 Wn.2d 52 , 195 P.2d 112 (1948), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 834 , 93 L. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.