Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Colemangreen1 sentence2021State v. Coleman, 159 Wn.2d 509, 512 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Camarillo
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Finch
green
1 sentence2020Finch, 137 Wn.2d at 859 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Cross
green
1 sentence2018The State may overcome this presumption by “showing that law enforcement officials informed the suspect of his or her right to remain silent and right to an attorney and that the suspect knowingly and intelligently waived those rights.” Cross, 180 Wn.2d at 682 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Ashcraft
green
1 sentence2018Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Boling
green
1 sentence2015State v. Boling, 131 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.