6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Addington v. Texasgreen2 sentences1984See also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 (1979). [3] The Legislature, by requiring the State to rebut the presumption of incapacity, has assumed a greater burden than the minimal proof imposed by the preponderance of the evidence standard. 1984See also Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 , 99 S.Ct. 1804 (1979). [3] The Legislature, by requiring the State to rebut the presumption of incapacity, has assumed a greater burden than the minimal proof imposed by the preponderance of the evidence standard. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Amundsengreen1 sentence1954See State v. Amundsen, 37 Wn. (2d) 356, 223 P. (2d) 1067 (1950); State v. Smith, 43 Wn. (2d) 307, 261 P. (2d) 109 (1953); State v. Rose, 43 Wn. (2d) 553, 262 P. (2d) 194 (1953), and cases cited. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arkansas v. Sanders
red
2 sentences1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 | 2 | 1989–1992 |
State v. Peña Fuentes
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 820 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences2013At the initial competency hearing in this case, the juvenile court relied on State v. Harris when it erroneously ruled that the burden of proof was on Tate.31 But Harris does not control this case. 28 Id, at § 904. 2914 30 Id. 31 Report of Proceedings (June 21, 2011) at 103-04 (citing State v. Harris, 114 Wn.2d 419 , 789 P.2d 60 (1990)). 2013At the initial competency hearing in this case, the juvenile court relied on State v. Harris when it erroneously ruled that the burden of proof was on Tate.31 But Harris does not control this case. 28 Id, at § 904. 2914 30 Id. 31 Report of Proceedings (June 21, 2011) at 103-04 (citing State v. Harris, 114 Wn.2d 419 , 789 P.2d 60 (1990)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Leach
green
2 sentences1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Ferree v. Doric Co.
green
2 sentences1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Fellers
green
1 sentence1992Ed. 2d 235 , 99 S. Ct. 2586 (1979)). 16 State v. Clark, supra. 17 See also Const, art. 1, § 22 (amend. 10) (an accused has the right to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury and the right to appeal in all cases). 18 See generally State v. Fellers, 37 Wn. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Dailey
green
2 sentences1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. Griffith
green
2 sentences1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 1992App. at 859 (failure to enter written findings and conclusions as required by CrR 3.6 held harmless error because the court's oral opinion was comprehensive). 13 See State v. Dailey, 93 Wn.2d 454, 458 , 610 P.2d 357 (1980) (a trial court's oral statements are merely a verbal expression of its informal opinion at the *207 time, "necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned.'") (quoting Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wn.2d 561, 567 , 383 P.2d 900 (1963)). 14 Metropolitan Park Dist. v. Griffith, 106 Wn.2d 425, 433 , 723 P.2d 1093 (1986). 1 | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence1954See State v. Amundsen, 37 Wn. (2d) 356, 223 P. (2d) 1067 (1950); State v. Smith, 43 Wn. (2d) 307, 261 P. (2d) 109 (1953); State v. Rose, 43 Wn. (2d) 553, 262 P. (2d) 194 (1953), and cases cited. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
State v. Rose
green
1 sentence1954See State v. Amundsen, 37 Wn. (2d) 356, 223 P. (2d) 1067 (1950); State v. Smith, 43 Wn. (2d) 307, 261 P. (2d) 109 (1953); State v. Rose, 43 Wn. (2d) 553, 262 P. (2d) 194 (1953), and cases cited. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.