Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Himbergreen2 sentences2021See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403, ¶¶ 118-21 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967), and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. 2020See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403 , ¶¶ 118-121 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967) and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Tatumgreen2 sentences2021See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403, ¶¶ 118-21 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967), and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. 2020See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403 , ¶¶ 118-121 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967) and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Sanchezgreen1 sentence2013Placek, 184 Ill. 2d at 381 . ¶ 61 “Predisposition is established by proof that the defendant was willing and able to commit the offense without persuasion before his initial exposure to government agents.” People v. Sanchez, 388 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Smothers
green
2 sentences1977People v. Redmond (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 328 , 320 N.E.2d 321 ; People v. Smothers (1973), 55 Ill. 2d 172 , 302 N.E.2d 324 . 1977People v. Redmond (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 328 , 320 N.E.2d 321 ; People v. Smothers (1973), 55 Ill. 2d 172 , 302 N.E.2d 324 . | 3 | 1974–1977 |
People v. Landry
green
2 sentences2021See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403, ¶¶ 118-21 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967), and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. 2020See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403 , ¶¶ 118-121 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967) and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
The People v. Lefler
green
2 sentences2021See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403, ¶¶ 118-21 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967), and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. 2020See People v. Himber, 2020 IL App (1st) 162182, ¶ 45 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were “used by the State to rebut the defense theory” about the circumstances surrounding a shooting); Tatum, 2019 IL App (1st) 162403 , ¶¶ 118-121 (finding the trial court properly allowed autopsy photographs to be shown to the jury where they were relevant to the parties’ theories of the case during closing argument). ¶ 100 Nevertheless, defendant points to People v. Lefler, 38 Ill. 2d 216 (1967) and People v. Landry, 54 Ill. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
People v. Placek
green
2 sentences2013Placek, 184 Ill. 2d at 381 . ¶ 61 “Predisposition is established by proof that the defendant was willing and able to commit the offense without persuasion before his initial exposure to government agents.” People v. Sanchez, 388 Ill. 2012Id. at 381 . ¶ 29 In this case, defendant presented evidence showing that Arellano initiated contact with him on November 21, 2006, and that Arellano first broached the subject of bribery when he asked defendant if he wanted to “do business” when they met at defendant’s garage at 8526 S. Burley. | 2 | 2012–2013 |
People v. Bonner
green
1 sentence2022People v. Anderson, 2013 IL App (2d) 111183, ¶ 60 ; Bonner, 385 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2022People v. Anderson, 2013 IL App (2d) 111183, ¶ 60 ; Bonner, 385 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Flores
green
1 sentence1993Flores, 193 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Ehrich
green
1 sentence1992People v. Ehrich (1988), 165 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Sledge
green
1 sentence1990Sledge, 183 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Rosa
green
1 sentence1989Rosa, 111 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Hayes
green
1 sentence1978(People v. Hayes (1st Dist. 1976), 37 Ill. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Redmond
green
2 sentences1977People v. Redmond (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 328 , 320 N.E.2d 321 ; People v. Smothers (1973), 55 Ill. 2d 172 , 302 N.E.2d 324 . 1977People v. Redmond (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 328 , 320 N.E.2d 321 ; People v. Smothers (1973), 55 Ill. 2d 172 , 302 N.E.2d 324 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.