time of the revocation hearing (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

time of the revocation hearing in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
State v. Whitegreen
washctapp · 1995 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

12

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Wood v. Georgia green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

2003Although it was not possible to ascertain whether the attorney's performance was influenced by the interests of the employer, the Court nevertheless held that "the possibility of a conflict of interest was sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 *438 S.Ct. 1097.

2003Although it was not possible to ascertain whether the attorney’s performance was influenced by the interests of the employer, the Court nevertheless held that “the possibility of a conflict of interest was sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further.” Id. at 272 .

51989–2003
Cuyler v. Sullivan green
scotus · 1980
2 sentences

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

21989–2000
In Re the Personal Restraint of Richardson green
wash · 1983
1 sentence

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

12000–2000
Strickland v. Washington green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

2000The Supreme Court determined that based upon the record in the case, there was a clear "possibility of a conflict of interest ... sufficiently apparent at the time of the revocation hearing to impose upon the court a duty to inquire further." Id. at 272 , 101 S.Ct. 1097 .) [352] Richardson, 100 Wash.2d at 677 , 675 P.2d 209 . [353] But see State v. White, 80 Wash.App. 406 , 907 P.2d 310 (1995), review denied, 129 Wash.2d 1012 , 917 P.2d 130 (1996). [354] Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (citing Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 ). [

12000–2000
In RE WOODS v. Rhay green
wash · 1966
2 sentences

1972Conclusion 6. 3 “The trial court’s conclusion 2 states: “That petitioner was accorded adequate due process of law during all stages of the proceedings on October 17, 1969 before the King County Superior Court, Cause No. 51732, at which time petitioner made and entered his plea of Guilty. *948 This court concludes that the plea of Guilty was freely, voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made by the petitioner with knowledge of his legal and constitutional rights.” 4 "The trial court’s conclusion 3 states: “This court tether concludes that at the time of the revocation hearing before the Hono

1972Conclusion 6. 3 “The trial court’s conclusion 2 states: “That petitioner was accorded adequate due process of law during all stages of the proceedings on October 17, 1969 before the King County Superior Court, Cause No. 51732, at which time petitioner made and entered his plea of Guilty. *948 This court concludes that the plea of Guilty was freely, voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made by the petitioner with knowledge of his legal and constitutional rights.” 4 "The trial court’s conclusion 3 states: “This court tether concludes that at the time of the revocation hearing before the Hono

11972–1972

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1973–2024) WA 6 (1972–2003) TN 5 (2010–2024) PA 5 (1977–2019) CA 5 (1989–2024) CO 5 (1979–2026) MD 4 (1984–2012) AL 4 (2014–2017) VA 4 (2005–2020) OH 3 (1989–2018) MN 3 (2006–2024) MO 2 (2015–2015) FL 2 (1987–2009) OK 2 (1973–1977) AR 2 (2013–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check