Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Krullgreen2 sentences2016See State v. Clark, 232 W.Va. 480, 492-93 , 752 S.E.2d 907, 919-20 (2013) (reiterating that “‘[w]hen evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.’ Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 107 S.Ct. 1160 , 94 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987).”). 6 Aside from petitioner’s assertion in this regard, there is no evidence that petitioner is, in fact, a Bahamian national. 2016See State v. Clark, 232 W.Va. 480, 492-93 , 752 S.E.2d 907, 919-20 (2013) (reiterating that “‘[w]hen evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.’ Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 107 S.Ct. 1160 , 94 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987).”). 6 Aside from petitioner’s assertion in this regard, there is no evidence that petitioner is, in fact, a Bahamian national. | 3 | 6 |
Illinois v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2013See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 183 , 110 S.Ct. 2793 , 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) (Under the exclusionary rule “no evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment [can] be introduced at [a defendant’s] trial unless he consents.”). 2013See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 183 , 110 S.Ct. 2793 , 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) (Under the exclusionary rule “no evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment [can] be introduced at [a defendant’s] trial unless he consents.”). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Legggreen2 sentences2024Va. 560 , 578 n.20, 575 S.E.2d 170 , 188 n.20 (2002) (quoting Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 (1987)); see Legg, 207 W. 2023Va. 560 , 578 n.20, 575 S.E.2d 170 , 188 n.20 (2002) (quoting Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 107 S. Ct. 1160, 1165 (1987)); see Legg, 207 W. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Clarkgreen2 sentences2016See State v. Clark, 232 W.Va. 480, 492-93 , 752 S.E.2d 907, 919-20 (2013) (reiterating that “‘[w]hen evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.’ Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 107 S.Ct. 1160 , 94 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987).”). 6 Aside from petitioner’s assertion in this regard, there is no evidence that petitioner is, in fact, a Bahamian national. 2016See State v. Clark, 232 W.Va. 480, 492-93 , 752 S.E.2d 907, 919-20 (2013) (reiterating that “‘[w]hen evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.’ Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 107 S.Ct. 1160 , 94 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987).”). 6 Aside from petitioner’s assertion in this regard, there is no evidence that petitioner is, in fact, a Bahamian national. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Flippo
green
2 sentences2024If evidence gathered from such a stop “is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.” State v. Flippo, 212 W. 2023Evidence gathered from such a stop “is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, [and] the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.” State v. Flippo, 212 W. | 2 | 2023–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.