Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Magic Toyota, Inc. v. Southeast Toyota Distributors, Inc.green1 sentence2018Toyota Distribs., Inc. , 784 F.Supp. 306 , 317 (D.S.C. 1992) ("[T]he American Law Institute test ... is almost identical to the newly implemented § 1391(b)(2)."). 59 Arandia v. Marriott Corp. , 668 F.Supp. 452 , 453 (D. | 1 | 1 |
Todd v. Toddgreen2 sentences2010We do not establish any minimum length of time for establishing psychological parent status, but we do agree with the ALI that [tlhe length of time that constitutes a significant period will depend on many circumstances, including the age of the child, the frequency of contact, and the intensity of the relationship." Id. 42 . 781 P.2d 985, 989 (Alaska 1989). 43 . 989 P.2d 141, 145 (Alaska 1999). 44 . 781 P.2d at 989 . 45 . 989 P.2d at 145 . 46 . 2010We do not establish any minimum length of time for establishing psychological parent status, but we do agree with the ALI that [tlhe length of time that constitutes a significant period will depend on many circumstances, including the age of the child, the frequency of contact, and the intensity of the relationship." Id. 42 . 781 P.2d 985, 989 (Alaska 1989). 43 . 989 P.2d 141, 145 (Alaska 1999). 44 . 781 P.2d at 989 . 45 . 989 P.2d at 145 . 46 . | 1 | 1 |
Buness v. Gillengreen2 sentences2010We do not establish any minimum length of time for establishing psychological parent status, but we do agree with the ALI that [tlhe length of time that constitutes a significant period will depend on many circumstances, including the age of the child, the frequency of contact, and the intensity of the relationship." Id. 42 . 781 P.2d 985, 989 (Alaska 1989). 43 . 989 P.2d 141, 145 (Alaska 1999). 44 . 781 P.2d at 989 . 45 . 989 P.2d at 145 . 46 . 2010We do not establish any minimum length of time for establishing psychological parent status, but we do agree with the ALI that [tlhe length of time that constitutes a significant period will depend on many circumstances, including the age of the child, the frequency of contact, and the intensity of the relationship." Id. 42 . 781 P.2d 985, 989 (Alaska 1989). 43 . 989 P.2d 141, 145 (Alaska 1999). 44 . 781 P.2d at 989 . 45 . 989 P.2d at 145 . 46 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Rosalind Edith Chandler, United States of America v. Frederick Freeman Leister, Jr.green2 sentences1973During the last ten years the American Law Institute test and others patterned after it have gained widespread acceptance. 4 Chief Judge Haynsworth comment ed on the desirability of the A.L.I. test in United States v. Chandler, 393 F.2d 920, 926 (4th Cir. 1968) (en banc): “With appropriate balance between cognition and volition, it demands an unrestricted inquiry into the whole personality of a defendant who surmounts the threshold question of doubt of his responsibility. 1973During the last ten years the American Law Institute test and others patterned after it have gained widespread acceptance. 4 Chief Judge Haynsworth comment ed on the desirability of the A.L.I. test in United States v. Chandler, 393 F.2d 920, 926 (4th Cir. 1968) (en banc): “With appropriate balance between cognition and volition, it demands an unrestricted inquiry into the whole personality of a defendant who surmounts the threshold question of doubt of his responsibility. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arandia v. Marriott Corp.
green
1 sentence2018Toyota Distribs., Inc. , 784 F.Supp. 306 , 317 (D.S.C. 1992) ("[T]he American Law Institute test ... is almost identical to the newly implemented § 1391(b)(2)."). 59 Arandia v. Marriott Corp. , 668 F.Supp. 452 , 453 (D. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Broadcasting Company of the Carolinas Robert A. Schmid v. Flair Broadcasting Corporation John N. Boden J. Timothy Harrington
green
2 sentences2018Co. of the Carolinas , 892 F.2d at 376 ; Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. , 596 F.2d 254 , 260-61 (8th Cir. 1979) (explaining that the American Law Institute rule was "derived from the ALI Study of the Division of Jurisdiction Between the State and Federal Courts, §§ 1303, 1314 (1969)"); Am. 2018Co. of the Carolinas , 892 F.2d at 376 ; Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. , 596 F.2d 254 , 260-61 (8th Cir. 1979) (explaining that the American Law Institute rule was "derived from the ALI Study of the Division of Jurisdiction Between the State and Federal Courts, §§ 1303, 1314 (1969)"); Am. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
cluster 365492
green
2 sentences2018Co. of the Carolinas , 892 F.2d at 376 ; Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. , 596 F.2d 254 , 260-61 (8th Cir. 1979) (explaining that the American Law Institute rule was "derived from the ALI Study of the Division of Jurisdiction Between the State and Federal Courts, §§ 1303, 1314 (1969)"); Am. 2018Co. of the Carolinas , 892 F.2d at 376 ; Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. , 596 F.2d 254 , 260-61 (8th Cir. 1979) (explaining that the American Law Institute rule was "derived from the ALI Study of the Division of Jurisdiction Between the State and Federal Courts, §§ 1303, 1314 (1969)"); Am. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Steussi v. State
neutral
1 sentence1978He cites Steussi v. State, 512 P.2d 589 (Alaska 1973), in which a case tried under the M’Naghten insanity standard was remanded after this court adopted the American Law Institute’s test as set forth in the Model Penal Code. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Grossman v. State
green
2 sentences1970There the state urged that if the M'Naghten test was not employed, the American Law Institute test (discussed later herein) would be the most suitable. [3] One such case was Grossman v. State, 457 P.2d 226 (Alaska 1969), adopting an objective standard of entrapment, though neither party directly briefed that doctrine. 1970There the state urged that if the M'Naghten test was not employed, the American Law Institute test (discussed later herein) would be the most suitable. [3] One such case was Grossman v. State, 457 P.2d 226 (Alaska 1969), adopting an objective standard of entrapment, though neither party directly briefed that doctrine. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.