Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
44 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2026 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McGhee v. Stategreen2 sentences2013McGhee v. State, 330 Ark. 38 , 954 S.W.2d 206 (1997). 2013McGhee v. State, 330 Ark. 38 , 954 S.W.2d 206 (1997). | 4 | 7 |
Danny Hopper v. Pamela Hoppergreen2 sentences2025See Hopper v. Hopper, 2023 Ark. 2025See Hopper v. Hopper, 2023 Ark. | 2 | 2 |
Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. Gilbert, Adm.green2 sentences1988Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1944); Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gilbert, 206 Ark. 683 , 178 S.W.2d 73 (1944); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. 1988Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1944); Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gilbert, 206 Ark. 683 , 178 S.W.2d 73 (1944); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. | 1 | 6 |
Rogers v. Ritchiegreen2 sentences2019See Rogers v. Ritchie, 2017 Ark. 2019See Rogers v. Ritchie, 2017 Ark. | 1 | 2 |
Rachel v. Rachelgreen1 sentence2024See, e.g., Rachel v. Rachel, 21 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
Security Pacific Housing Services, Inc. v. Friddlegreen2 sentences2023Servs., Inc. v. Friddle, 315 Ark. 178, 182 , 866 S.W.2d 375, 377 (1993) (holding that pursuant to the doctrine of invited error, an appellant cannot request a ruling by a circuit court and then complain of that ruling on appeal). 2023Servs., Inc. v. Friddle, 315 Ark. 178, 182 , 866 S.W.2d 375, 377 (1993) (holding that pursuant to the doctrine of invited error, an appellant cannot request a ruling by a circuit court and then complain of that ruling on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Terry v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See id. | 1 | 1 |
Daniels v. Cravensgreen2 sentences2011Daniels v. Cravens, 297 Ark. 388, 390 , 761 S.W.2d 942, 943 (1988) (citing Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1964); Missouri Pac. 2011Daniels v. Cravens, 297 Ark. 388, 390 , 761 S.W.2d 942, 943 (1988) (citing Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1964); Missouri Pac. | 1 | 1 |
Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & Trustgreen2 sentences1993See Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & Trust, 306 Ark. 28 , 811 S.W.2d 281 (1991). 1993See Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & Trust, 306 Ark. 28 , 811 S.W.2d 281 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Berry v. Stategreen2 sentences1992See Berry v. State, 278 Ark. 578 , 647 S.W.2d 453 (1983); Kaestel v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 626 S.W.2d 940 (1982); see also Clinkscale v. State, 13 Ark. 1992See Berry v. State, 278 Ark. 578 , 647 S.W.2d 453 (1983); Kaestel v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 626 S.W.2d 940 (1982); see also Clinkscale v. State, 13 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
Clinkscale v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Berry v. State, 278 Ark. 578 , 647 S.W.2d 453 (1983); Kaestel v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 626 S.W.2d 940 (1982); see also Clinkscale v. State, 13 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Britton v. State
green
2 sentences2026Britton v. State, 2014 Ark. 192 , 433 S.W.3d 856 . 2026Britton v. State, 2014 Ark. 192 , 433 S.W.3d 856 . | 4 | 2024–2026 |
Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2011 Ark. 256 , 381 S.W.3d 840 (2011); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. 2016Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2011 Ark. 256 , 381 S.W.3d 840 (2011); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. | 3 | 1987–2016 |
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Burton
neutral
2 sentences1987See Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gilbert, 206 Ark. 683 , 178 S.W.2d 73 (1944); Kansas City Southern Railroad Co. v. Burton, 122 Ark. 297 , 183 S.W.2d 189 (1916) and J. 1987See Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gilbert, 206 Ark. 683 , 178 S.W.2d 73 (1944); Kansas City Southern Railroad Co. v. Burton, 122 Ark. 297 , 183 S.W.2d 189 (1916) and J. | 3 | 1983–1987 |
Lester Keith Hamaker v. Donna Louise Hamaker
neutral
2 sentences2026Hamaker v. Hamaker, 2025 Ark. 2026Hamaker v. Hamaker, 2025 Ark. | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2011Daniels v. Cravens, 297 Ark. 388, 390 , 761 S.W.2d 942, 943 (1988) (citing Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1964); Missouri Pac. 2011Daniels v. Cravens, 297 Ark. 388, 390 , 761 S.W.2d 942, 943 (1988) (citing Jones v. Dierks Forests, Inc., 238 Ark. 551 , 383 S.W.2d 110 (1964); Missouri Pac. | 2 | 1988–2011 |
Wyles v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Kaestel v. State
green
2 sentences2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. 2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. | 2 | 1992–2000 |
Morgan v. State
green
2 sentences1999McGhee v. State, 330 Ark. 38 , 954 S.W.2d 206 (1997); Morgan v. State, 308 Ark. 627 , 826 S.W.2d 271 (1992). 1999McGhee v. State, 330 Ark. 38 , 954 S.W.2d 206 (1997); Morgan v. State, 308 Ark. 627 , 826 S.W.2d 271 (1992). | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Kevin Cheri v. Laura Cheri
green
1 sentence2025Cheri v. Cheri, 2024 Ark. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic
green
2 sentences2023It is well settled that under the doctrine of invited error, appellant may not complain on appeal of an erroneous action of the circuit court if he had induced or acquiesced to the action.4 Additionally, appellant 3 2020 Ark. 384 (per curiam). 4 See Mo. Pac. 2023It is well settled that under the doctrine of invited error, appellant may not complain on appeal of an erroneous action of the circuit court if he had induced or acquiesced to the action.4 Additionally, appellant 3 2020 Ark. 384 (per curiam). 4 See Mo. Pac. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Parnell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
neutral
1 sentence2019App. 108 , 538 S.W.3d 264 (holding that, pursuant to the invited-error doctrine, Parnell was precluded from arguing the elements of the failure-to-remedy ground on appeal when the elements were not disputed at trial). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Smith-Mcleod v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & I.M.
neutral
2 sentences2019In Smith-McLeod v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 2019 Ark. 2019In Smith-McLeod v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 2019 Ark. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2016Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2011 Ark. 256 , 381 S.W.3d 840 (2011); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. 2016Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2011 Ark. 256 , 381 S.W.3d 840 (2011); Briscoe v. Shoppers News, Inc., 10 Ark. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Crenshaw v. McFalls
neutral
2 sentences2016In Graham, we granted a petition for review and ultimately held that 4 Cite as 2016 Ark. 39 the Crenshaws’ argument is that the court of appeals failed to address the doctrine of invited error. 2016In Graham, we granted a petition for review and ultimately held that 4 Cite as 2016 Ark. 39 the Crenshaws’ argument is that the court of appeals failed to address the doctrine of invited error. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Balcom v. Crain
green
2 sentences2016Under the doctrine of invited error, an appellant may not complain on appeal of an erroneous action by the trial court if he has induced, consented to, or acquiesced in that 5 Cite as 2016 Ark. 2016Under the doctrine of invited error, an appellant may not complain on appeal of an erroneous action by the trial court if he has induced, consented to, or acquiesced in that 5 Cite as 2016 Ark. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Watson v. City of Fayetteville
green
1 sentence2001Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Gilbert
green
2 sentences2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. 2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Wood v. Lathrop
green
2 sentences1993The leading case in Arkansas on the filing of cross motions for summary judgment is undoubtedly Wood v. Lathrop, 249 Ark. 376 , 459 S.W.2d 808 (1970). 1993The leading case in Arkansas on the filing of cross motions for summary judgment is undoubtedly Wood v. Lathrop, 249 Ark. 376 , 459 S.W.2d 808 (1970). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Home Co. v. Lammers
green
2 sentences1964The Home Company v. Lammers, 221 Ark. 311 , 254 S. W. 2d 65 . 1964The Home Company v. Lammers, 221 Ark. 311 , 254 S. W. 2d 65 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
| Wolff v. Alexander Film Company green | 1 | 1944–1944 |
| Smith v. State neutral | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Tarkington v. State neutral | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.