first six factors (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

first six factors in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1990–1990 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Faulk & Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co. green
ala · 1912
2 sentences

1990The first six factors cited were set forth by Justice Somerville over 77 years ago: “ ‘The general principle is everywhere established that an attorney is in such a case entitled to reasonable compensation for his services, appropriate to his employment, rendered by him to his client. —Humes v. Decatur, etc., Co., 98 Ala. 461, 470 , 13 South. 368 [1893], In the estimation of their value many elements may be material for consideration, among which are the nature and value of the subject-matter of the employment; the learning, skill and labor requisite to its proper discharge; the time consumed;

1990The first six factors cited were set forth by Justice Somerville over 77 years ago: “ ‘The general principle is everywhere established that an attorney is in such a case entitled to reasonable compensation for his services, appropriate to his employment, rendered by him to his client. —Humes v. Decatur, etc., Co., 98 Ala. 461, 470 , 13 South. 368 [1893], In the estimation of their value many elements may be material for consideration, among which are the nature and value of the subject-matter of the employment; the learning, skill and labor requisite to its proper discharge; the time consumed;

51990–1990
Peebles v. Miley green
ala · 1983
2 sentences

1990Faulk Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co. , 178 Ala. 254 , 59 So. 450 (1912); the seventh factor was added in King v. Keith , 257 Ala. 463 , 60 So.2d 47 (1952); and the last five factors were adopted in Peebles from DR 2-106(b) of the American Bar Association's Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1982).) We further noted in Peebles that "[o]ur cases recognize that an attorney on a contingent fee basis is entitled to charge more than an attorney who is guaranteed compensation by periodic billings." 439 So.2d at 142 .

1990The first six factors cited were set forth by Justice Somerville over 77 years ago: “ ‘The general principle is everywhere established that an attorney is in such a case entitled to reasonable compensation for his services, appropriate to his employment, rendered by him to his client. —Humes v. Decatur, etc., Co., 98 Ala. 461, 470 , 13 South. 368 [1893], In the estimation of their value many elements may be material for consideration, among which are the nature and value of the subject-matter of the employment; the learning, skill and labor requisite to its proper discharge; the time consumed;

41990–1990
Humes v. Decatur Land Im. & Furnace Co. neutral
ala · 1893
2 sentences

1990The first six factors cited were set forth by Justice Somerville over 77 years ago: “ ‘The general principle is everywhere established that an attorney is in such a case entitled to reasonable compensation for his services, appropriate to his employment, rendered by him to his client. —Humes v. Decatur, etc., Co., 98 Ala. 461, 470 , 13 South. 368 [1893], In the estimation of their value many elements may be material for consideration, among which are the nature and value of the subject-matter of the employment; the learning, skill and labor requisite to its proper discharge; the time consumed;

1990The first six factors cited were set forth by Justice Somerville over 77 years ago: "`The general principle is everywhere established that an attorney is in such a case entitled to reasonable compensation for his services, appropriate to his employment, rendered by him to his client. — Humes v. Decatur, etc., Co., 98 Ala. 461, 470 , 13 South. 368 [1893].

31990–1990
King v. Keith green
ala · 1952
2 sentences

1990Faulk Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co. , 178 Ala. 254 , 59 So. 450 (1912); the seventh factor was added in King v. Keith , 257 Ala. 463 , 60 So.2d 47 (1952); and the last five factors were adopted in Peebles from DR 2-106(b) of the American Bar Association's Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1982).) We further noted in Peebles that "[o]ur cases recognize that an attorney on a contingent fee basis is entitled to charge more than an attorney who is guaranteed compensation by periodic billings." 439 So.2d at 142 .

1990Faulk Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co. , 178 Ala. 254 , 59 So. 450 (1912); the seventh factor was added in King v. Keith , 257 Ala. 463 , 60 So.2d 47 (1952); and the last five factors were adopted in Peebles from DR 2-106(b) of the American Bar Association's Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1982).) We further noted in Peebles that "[o]ur cases recognize that an attorney on a contingent fee basis is entitled to charge more than an attorney who is guaranteed compensation by periodic billings." 439 So.2d at 142 .

21990–1990

Where else courts name it

AL 5 (1990–1990) MS 2 (2003–2005) KY 2 (2020–2020) OH 2 (2014–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check