Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Paul Mitchell Lilly v. State of Arkansasgreen2 sentences2025The Dinwiddie factors were applied in both Jones, supra, and Lilly v. State, 2020 Ark. 2025The Dinwiddie factors were applied in both Jones, supra, and Lilly v. State, 2020 Ark. | 1 | 2 |
In Re Kyle M.green2 sentences2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). 2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2025We disagree and note our supreme court’s conclusion that “an objective test focusing on how a reasonable person would have taken the statement and using the Dinwiddie factors has the most merit.” Jones, 347 Ark. at 421 , 64 S.W.3d at 736 . 2025We disagree and note our supreme court’s conclusion that “an objective test focusing on how a reasonable person would have taken the statement and using the Dinwiddie factors has the most merit.” Jones, 347 Ark. at 421 , 64 S.W.3d at 736 . | 4 | 2020–2025 |
State v. Perkins
green
2 sentences2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). 2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
People v. Steven S.
green
2 sentences2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). 2002See also In re Kyle M., 200 Ariz. 447 , 27 P.3d 804 (Ct. App. 2001); State v. Perkins, 243 Wis. 2d 141 , 626 N.W.2d 762 (2001); In re Steven S., 25 Cal. App. 4th 598 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 644 (1994). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.