Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Fruchtmangreen2 sentences2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. 2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. | 1 | 1 |
Haschke v. Uniflow Manufacturing Co.green2 sentences2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. 2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. | 1 | 1 |
Ezell v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. | 1 | 1 |
Koo v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Co., 268 Ill.App.3d 1045 , 206 Ill.Dec. 387 , 645 N.E.2d 392, 396 (1994) (vesting trial court with discretion to fashion remedy for Bat-son violation); Koo v. State, 640 N.E.2d 95, 100 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994) (remedy for Batson violation left to trial court’s discretion); Commonwealth v. Fruchtman, 418 Mass. 8 , 633 N.E.2d 369, 373 (1994) (choice of remedy for Batson violation "the prerogative of the judge”); Ezell v. State, 909 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gallardogreen2 sentences2012State v. Gallardo, 225 Ariz. 560, ¶ 11 , 242 P.3d 159, 164 (2010). 2012State v. Gallardo, 225 Ariz. 560, ¶ 11 , 242 P.3d 159, 164 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences2012State v. Francis, No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0020, ¶ 13, 2010 WL 1636047 (memorandum decision filed Apr. 22, 2010). 5 The state, relying on Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 149 Ariz. 480, 482 , 720 P.2d 81, 83 (1986), asserts “that the decision of a court in a ease is the law of that ease on the issues decided throughout all subsequent proceedings in both the trial and appellate courts, provided the facts, issues and evidence are substantially the same as those upon which the first decision rested.” In Dancing Sunshines Lounge , the court noted that “ ‘law of the ease’ is ge 2012State v. Francis, No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0020, ¶ 13, 2010 WL 1636047 (memorandum decision filed Apr. 22, 2010). 5 The state, relying on Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 149 Ariz. 480, 482 , 720 P.2d 81, 83 (1986), asserts “that the decision of a court in a ease is the law of that ease on the issues decided throughout all subsequent proceedings in both the trial and appellate courts, provided the facts, issues and evidence are substantially the same as those upon which the first decision rested.” In Dancing Sunshines Lounge , the court noted that “ ‘law of the ease’ is ge | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jordangreen2 sentences1993This case is a criminal case in which the defendant, a member of a cognizable racial minority, see State v. Jordan, 171 Ariz. 62, 66 , 828 P.2d 786, 790 (App.1992) (Batson applies to all ethnic and racial groups); State v. Boston, 170 Ariz. 315 , 823 P.2d 1323 (App.1991) (finding Bat-son violation when state struck an Hispanic *398 woman), challenges the prosecution’s peremptory challenges against members of the same cognizable racial minority. 1993This case is a criminal case in which the defendant, a member of a cognizable racial minority, see State v. Jordan, 171 Ariz. 62, 66 , 828 P.2d 786, 790 (App.1992) (Batson applies to all ethnic and racial groups); State v. Boston, 170 Ariz. 315 , 823 P.2d 1323 (App.1991) (finding Bat-son violation when state struck an Hispanic *398 woman), challenges the prosecution’s peremptory challenges against members of the same cognizable racial minority. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Francis
green
1 sentence2012State v. Francis, No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0020, ¶ 13, 2010 WL 1636047 (memorandum decision filed Apr. 22, 2010). 5 The state, relying on Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 149 Ariz. 480, 482 , 720 P.2d 81, 83 (1986), asserts “that the decision of a court in a ease is the law of that ease on the issues decided throughout all subsequent proceedings in both the trial and appellate courts, provided the facts, issues and evidence are substantially the same as those upon which the first decision rested.” In Dancing Sunshines Lounge , the court noted that “ ‘law of the ease’ is ge | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Boston
green
2 sentences1993This case is a criminal case in which the defendant, a member of a cognizable racial minority, see State v. Jordan, 171 Ariz. 62, 66 , 828 P.2d 786, 790 (App.1992) (Batson applies to all ethnic and racial groups); State v. Boston, 170 Ariz. 315 , 823 P.2d 1323 (App.1991) (finding Bat-son violation when state struck an Hispanic *398 woman), challenges the prosecution’s peremptory challenges against members of the same cognizable racial minority. 1993This case is a criminal case in which the defendant, a member of a cognizable racial minority, see State v. Jordan, 171 Ariz. 62, 66 , 828 P.2d 786, 790 (App.1992) (Batson applies to all ethnic and racial groups); State v. Boston, 170 Ariz. 315 , 823 P.2d 1323 (App.1991) (finding Bat-son violation when state struck an Hispanic *398 woman), challenges the prosecution’s peremptory challenges against members of the same cognizable racial minority. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences1993State v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 35 , 754 P.2d 1139 (1988). 1993State v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 35 , 754 P.2d 1139 (1988). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Ford v. State
green
2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). 1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
People v. Holder
green
2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). 1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Weekly v. State
green
2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). 1987Ford v. State, 180 Ga.App. 807 , 350 S.E.2d 816 (1986); People v. Holder, 153 Ill.App.3d 884 , 106 Ill.Dec.700, 506 N.E.2d 407 (1987); Weekly v. State, 496 N.E.2d 29 (Ind.1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.