Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCgreen2 sentences2017See CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC, 236 Ariz. 410 , 412 ¶ 12, 341 P.3d 452, 454 (2014) (“The fair market value provision, as well as the deed of trust framework generally, accords with Arizona’s long-recognized public policy of protecting debtors.”). ¶ 17 In the insurer/insured context, however, Arizona’s public policy protects insureds. 2017See CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC, 236 Ariz. 410 , 412 ¶ 12, 341 P.3d 452, 454 (2014) (“The fair market value provision, as well as the deed of trust framework generally, accords with Arizona’s long-recognized public policy of protecting debtors.”). ¶ 17 In the insurer/insured context, however, Arizona’s public policy protects insureds. | 1 | 1 |
Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Braingreen2 sentences2015Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Brain, 234 Ariz. 322 , 325 ¶ 11, 322 P.3d 139, 142 (2014). ¶ 8 Our legislature adopted the deed of trust framework in 1971 as an alternative to judicial foreclosures. 2015Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Brain, 234 Ariz. 322 , 325 ¶ 11, 322 P.3d 139, 142 (2014). ¶ 8 Our legislature adopted the deed of trust framework in 1971 as an alternative to judicial foreclosures. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Krohngreen2 sentences2015In re Krohn, 203 Ariz. 205 , 208 ¶ 10, 52 P.3d 774, 777 (2002). 2015In re Krohn, 203 Ariz. 205 , 208 ¶ 10, 52 P.3d 774, 777 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCgreen2 sentences2015BMO Harris Bank, 236 Ariz. at 365, ¶ 8 , 340 P.3d at 1073 . 2015BMO Harris Bank, 236 Ariz. at 365, ¶ 8 , 340 P.3d at 1073 . | 1 | 1 |
Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.green2 sentences2014Corp., 167 Ariz. 122, 128 , 804 P.2d 1310, 1316 (1991). ¶ 12 The fair market value provision, as well as the deed of trust framework generally, accords with Arizona’s long-recognized public policy of protecting debtors. 2014Corp., 167 Ariz. 122, 128 , 804 P.2d 1310, 1316 (1991). ¶ 12 The fair market value provision, as well as the deed of trust framework generally, accords with Arizona’s long-recognized public policy of protecting debtors. | 1 | 1 |
Forbach v. Steinfeldgreen2 sentences2014Cf. For-bach v. Steinfeld, 34 Ariz. 519, 526-27 , 273 P. 6, 9 (1928) (noting that “the public policy of the state” is to maintain important legal protections for debtors). 2014Cf. For-bach v. Steinfeld, 34 Ariz. 519, 526-27 , 273 P. 6, 9 (1928) (noting that “the public policy of the state” is to maintain important legal protections for debtors). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. City of Mesa
green
1 sentence2023Coleman v. City of Mesa, 230 Ariz. 352 , 355–56, ¶¶ 7–9 (2012). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.