res judicata operates to bar relitigation doctrine (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

res judicata operates to bar relitigation doctrine in Arizona

5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commissiongreen
ariz · 1986 · cited in 3 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2000–2006
2 sentences

2000See Pima County Bd., 149 Ariz. at 43, 716 P.2d at 412 (“After findings and an award are made, the doctrine of res judicata operates to bar relitigation of issues which were or could have been decided at that proceeding.”).

2000See Pima County Bd., 149 Ariz. at 43, 716 P.2d at 412 (“After findings and an award are made, the doctrine of res judicata operates to bar relitigation of issues which were or could have been decided at that proceeding.”).

33
Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commissiongreen
ariz · 1985 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986Stainless Steel Specialty Manufacturing Company v. Industrial Commission, 144 Ariz. 12, 15 , 695 P.2d 261, 264 (1985).

1986Stainless Steel Specialty Manufacturing Company v. Industrial Commission, 144 Ariz. 12, 15 , 695 P.2d 261, 264 (1985).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Noble v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona green
arizctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1985Noble v. Industrial Commission, 140 Ariz. 571 , 683 P.2d 1173 (App.1984).

1985Noble v. Industrial Commission, 140 Ariz. 571 , 683 P.2d 1173 (App.1984).

11985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1044 (5) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1061 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AZ 5 (1985–2006) WI 2 (1985–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check