Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Companygreen2 sentences1992Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company, 24 Ariz.App. 233, 237 , 537 P.2d 618, 622 (1975). 1992Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company, 24 Ariz.App. 233, 237 , 537 P.2d 618, 622 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moretto v. Samaritan Health System
green
2 sentences2000In August 1996, more than two years after the back injury, Samaritan moved to dismiss, asserting pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1023(B) that any right to bring the suit had passed to Reliance Insurance Company, Moretto’s compensation provider, and that Moretto had not obtained a reassignment of the claim. ¶ 7 The trial court granted Samaritan’s motion, but in Moretto v. Samaritan, 190 Ariz. 343 , 947 P.2d 917 (App.1997) (“Moretto 1 ”), this court reversed. 2000In August 1996, more than two years after the back injury, Samaritan moved to dismiss, asserting pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1023(B) that any right to bring the suit had passed to Reliance Insurance Company, Moretto’s compensation provider, and that Moretto had not obtained a reassignment of the claim. ¶ 7 The trial court granted Samaritan’s motion, but in Moretto v. Samaritan, 190 Ariz. 343 , 947 P.2d 917 (App.1997) (“Moretto 1 ”), this court reversed. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Samaritan Foundation v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1993Samaritan Foundation v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 426 , 844 P.2d 593 (App.1992). 1993Samaritan Foundation v. Superior Court, 173 Ariz. 426 , 844 P.2d 593 (App.1992). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Barker v. General Petroleum Corp.
green
2 sentences1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). 1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Barker v. General Petroleum Corp.
green
2 sentences1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). 1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
cluster 277140
green
1 sentence1987This “duty” is commonly referred to as the “good Samaritan rule.” The doctrine is inapplicable here, Roberson v. United States, 382 F.2d 714 (9th Cir.1967)(physical harm required). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Donn v. Kunz
neutral
2 sentences1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). 1987DIRECTED VERDICT FOR MARYVALE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Lastly, the defendants argue that if the trial court properly denied Samaritan’s motion for directed verdict, then it improperly denied Maryvale Emergency Physicians’ motion for directed verdict, under the principle of law set forth in Donn v. Kunz, 52 Ariz. 219 , 79 P.2d 965 (1938), and Barker v. General Petroleum Corp., 72 Ariz. 187 , 232 P.2d 390 , modified on other grounds, 72 Ariz. 238 , 233 P.2d 449 (1951). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.