law bad faith claim (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

law bad faith claim in Colorado

5 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Dale v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.green
colo · 1997 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See Dale, 948 P.2d at 552 .

11
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Saviogreen
colo · 1985 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See Savio, 706 P.2d at 1275 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Nunn v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. green
colo · 2011
1 sentence

2021Id.

12021–2021
Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. green
coloctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2016But when the General Assembly enacted this statute it created “a new private right of action for insureds in addition to and different from a common law bad faith claim.” Kisselman, 292 P.3d at 975 .

12016–2016
Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange green
colo · 1996
1 sentence

2013But, as alluded to above, under the common law, fees incurred as a result of 'an insurer's bad faith breach of the insurance contract are already awardable as damages; the fees incurred in the action against the insurer are not, Bernhard, 915 P.2d at 1291 , A common law bad faith claim will often (indeed, perhaps almost always) accompany a claim under sections 10-8-1115 and -1116.

12013–2013
Hill v. DeWitt green
colo · 2002
1 sentence

2012The trial court here acknowledged as much by denying plaintiff's motion seeking to add a common law bad faith claim because the two actions involved "different standards." Denial of that motion also underscores the fact that common law bad faith is not at issue in this appeal. 136 Although plaintiffs UIM claim was filed and processed in part before the Statutes took effect, it does not necessarily follow that defendant was held retroactively liable for "transactions or considerations already past," DeWitt, 54 P.3d at 854 .

12012–2012

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-3-1115 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WV 8 (1998–2016) TX 6 (2000–2017) CO 5 (2011–2021) MT 3 (2009–2026) IA 2 (2016–2016) FL 2 (1999–2010) CA 2 (1999–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check