neglect hearing in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Malave v. Ortizgreen connappct · 2009 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75	1	1
Doe v. Doegreen conn · 1998 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Freund v. Burns green conn · 1944 2 sentences 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75	1	2010–2010
Dunham v. Dunham green conn · 1922 2 sentences 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75	1	2010–2010
Boardman v. Boardman green conn · 1948 2 sentences 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75 2010See Malave v. Ortiz, 114 Conn.App. 414, 417 , 970 A.2d 743 (2009). [10] Other than his own testimony, the father offered no other evidence to prove that he was a custodial parent. [11] The case law on which the majority relies for the proposition that a parent is a custodial parent Doe v. Doe, 244 Conn. 403, 476 , 710 A.2d 1297 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Boardman v. Boardman, 135 Conn. 124, 129 , 62 A.2d 521 (1948); Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 442 , 117 A. 504 (1922), overruled in part on other grounds by Freund v. Burns, 131 Conn. 380, 385 , 40 A.2d 75	1	2010–2010
In re Noel M. green connappct · 1990 2 sentences 2008The respondent's rights to confrontation and cross-examination here are not constitutional rights, but rather statutory ones." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Noel M., 23 Conn.App. 410, 421 , 580 A.2d 996 (1990). 2008The respondent's rights to confrontation and cross-examination here are not constitutional rights, but rather statutory ones." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Noel M., 23 Conn.App. 410, 421 , 580 A.2d 996 (1990).	1	2008–2008
Levine v. Police Commission of Fairfield green conn · 1992 1 sentence 2000CT Page 12319 denied, 223 Conn. 922 , 614 A.2d 823 (1992), addresses whether the trial court's taking judicial notice of findings from an earlier neglect hearing in a subsequent termination of parental rights hearing constitutes plain error.	1	2000–2000
In re Mark C. green conn · 1992 1 sentence 2000CT Page 12319 denied, 223 Conn. 922 , 614 A.2d 823 (1992), addresses whether the trial court's taking judicial notice of findings from an earlier neglect hearing in a subsequent termination of parental rights hearing constitutes plain error.	1	2000–2000
Lipwich v. Frankel green connappct · 1997 1 sentence 1998Section 52-572h (c) talks explicitly in terms of a "negligence action." It is true that § 13a-144 refers to a neglect standard in the actual application of that statute, cf Lipwich v. Frankel, 44 Conn. App. 651 , 654 (1997).	1	1998–1998
State v. Fritz green conn · 1987 2 sentences 1990Collateral estoppel has been defined by our Supreme Court as “ ‘ “that aspect of the doctrine of res judicata which serves to estop the relitigation by parties and their privities of any right, fact or legal matter which is put in issue and has been determined by a . . . court of competent jurisdiction.” ’ ” State v. Fritz, 204 Conn. 156, 172 , 527 A.2d 1157 (1987). 1990Collateral estoppel has been defined by our Supreme Court as “ ‘ “that aspect of the doctrine of res judicata which serves to estop the relitigation by parties and their privities of any right, fact or legal matter which is put in issue and has been determined by a . . . court of competent jurisdiction.” ’ ” State v. Fritz, 204 Conn. 156, 172 , 527 A.2d 1157 (1987).	1	1990–1990

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-129 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 26 (1893–2026) DC 13 (1984–2013) IL 7 (1873–2013) MI 6 (1918–2024) CA 6 (1908–2025) CT 5 (1990–2010) NC 4 (1895–2025) NM 3 (2021–2024) ND 2 (1984–2016) WA 2 (1923–2026) MT 2 (1984–1988) TX 2 (1937–1998) OR 2 (2004–2024) NJ 2 (1974–2015) MO 2 (1994–2023) ID 2 (2013–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check