belated warning (District of Columbia) · Go Syfert
← District of Columbia issues

belated warning in District of Columbia

5 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Lemke v. International Total Services, Inc.green
njd · 1999 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023Stat. Ann. §§ 10:5-13 , 10:5-27, which is similar to the DCHRA, courts have observed that “the purpose of the exclusivity provision was not thwarted by allowing the plaintiff to proceed with her civil action even though her [administrative discrimination] complaint was withdrawn after the action was filed.” Lemke v. International Total Servs., 56 F. Supp. 2d 472, 482-83 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Wilson, 729 A.2d at 1010 (rejecting the “arbitrary result[]” that a complainant who withdrew an administrative complaint before filing a judicial action could proceed, while a plaintiff who withdrew afte

11
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Storesgreen
nj · 1999 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023Stat. Ann. §§ 10:5-13 , 10:5-27, which is similar to the DCHRA, courts have observed that “the purpose of the exclusivity provision was not thwarted by allowing the plaintiff to proceed with her civil action even though her [administrative discrimination] complaint was withdrawn after the action was filed.” Lemke v. International Total Servs., 56 F. Supp. 2d 472, 482-83 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Wilson, 729 A.2d at 1010 (rejecting the “arbitrary result[]” that a complainant who withdrew an administrative complaint before filing a judicial action could proceed, while a plaintiff who withdrew afte

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Kotteakos v. United States green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

2003Kotteakos, 328 U.S. at 765, 66 S.Ct. 1239 . [15] In sum, the judgment should be affirmed.

2003Kotteakos, 328 U.S. at 765, 66 S.Ct. 1239 . 15 In sum, the judgment should be affirmed. .

12003–2003
Hotel Tabard Inn v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission green
dc · 1995
1 sentence

2000Moreover, in Hotel Tabard Inn, supra, we considered the Archdiocese’s “contested case” argument with respect to our jurisdiction in that case involving the validity of the Commission’s second extension of the PUD order.

12000–2000
Miller v. Fenton green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

1998The Supreme Court recognized in Miller, which was decided after Elstad , that because “ours is an accusatorial and not an inquisitorial system, ... tactics for eliciting inculpatory statements must fall within the broad constitutional boundaries imposed by the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of fundamental fairness.” 474 U.S. at 110 , 106 S.Ct. 445 (internal citation omitted).

1998The Supreme Court recognized in Miller, which was decided after Elstad , that because “ours is an accusatorial and not an inquisitorial system, ... tactics for eliciting inculpatory statements must fall within the broad constitutional boundaries imposed by the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of fundamental fairness.” 474 U.S. at 110 , 106 S.Ct. 445 (internal citation omitted).

11998–1998
Reed v. Ross green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

1987Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1, 11 , 104 S.Ct. 2901, 2907 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984).

1987Reed v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1, 11 , 104 S.Ct. 2901, 2907 , 82 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984).

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

NY 38 (1928–2025) CA 36 (1927–2025) TN 17 (1982–2021) FL 14 (1969–2023) NJ 11 (1971–2022) OR 10 (1958–2026) PA 8 (1930–2024) TX 8 (1932–2012) ME 7 (1960–2021) NE 7 (1953–2000) MD 6 (1960–2022) IN 6 (1968–2018) OH 6 (1957–2017) WA 6 (1984–2021) IL 6 (1920–2024) DC 5 (1987–2023) NV 4 (1980–1996) LA 4 (1964–2022) MS 4 (1977–2015) CO 3 (1992–2004) MO 3 (1972–2005) OK 3 (1970–1993) MT 3 (1985–1997) SC 3 (1993–2013) KS 3 (1905–2000) GA 3 (2007–2022) AZ 3 (2016–2025) IA 3 (1939–2011) VT 3 (2007–2007) CT 2 (1999–2000) RI 2 (1990–2019) MI 2 (1975–1992) MA 2 (1997–2024) NC 2 (1995–2014) MN 2 (1956–1987) UT 2 (2020–2021) WI 2 (2004–2009) NM 2 (1994–1994) SD 2 (2019–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check