Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1920–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Novakgreen1 sentence2014Id. ¶ 24. ¶ 35 We find the instant appeal indistinguishable from Avery, and thus conclude that the ruling in White does not apply retroactively to this case on collateral review and that defendant’s convictions and sentences must stand. -8- ¶ 36 Further, even if White was not a new rule of law, defendant’s argument would not succeed because he is estopped from raising a belated challenge to his plea agreement when the error was to his benefit. “[A] reviewing court ‘can sustain the decision of a lower court for any appropriate reason, regardless of whether the lower court relied on those ground | 1 | 1 |
People v. Evansgreen2 sentences2014Id. ¶ 24. ¶ 35 We find the instant appeal indistinguishable from Avery, and thus conclude that the ruling in White does not apply retroactively to this case on collateral review and that defendant’s convictions and sentences must stand. -8- ¶ 36 Further, even if White was not a new rule of law, defendant’s argument would not succeed because he is estopped from raising a belated challenge to his plea agreement when the error was to his benefit. “[A] reviewing court ‘can sustain the decision of a lower court for any appropriate reason, regardless of whether the lower court relied on those ground 2014“Although plea agreements exist in the criminal justice structure, they are governed to some extent by contract law principles.” Evans, 174 Ill. 2d at 326 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2014Id. ¶ 24. ¶ 35 We find the instant appeal indistinguishable from Avery, and thus conclude that the ruling in White does not apply retroactively to this case on collateral review and that defendant’s convictions and sentences must stand. -8- ¶ 36 Further, even if White was not a new rule of law, defendant’s argument would not succeed because he is estopped from raising a belated challenge to his plea agreement when the error was to his benefit. “[A] reviewing court ‘can sustain the decision of a lower court for any appropriate reason, regardless of whether the lower court relied on those ground | 1 | 1 |
Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp.green2 sentences1995See Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 363, 374-77 , 553 N.E.2d 291, 296-97 ; see also 3A C. 1995See Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 363, 374-77 , 553 N.E.2d 291, 296-97 ; see also 3A C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anundson v. City of Chicago
green
1 sentence2024As in Anundson, 44 Ill. 2d at 497 , the facts here demonstrate that the Dungans acted “without undue delay” after determining that their objections “would be ineffectual.” Thus, their petition to intervene was timely filed. ¶ 32 Nonetheless, the City claims that the Dungans’ attempt to intervene were actually a belated challenge to the new zoning ordinance and the construction permits issued to Eggleston after they failed to seek timely administrative review. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Kness
green
1 sentence1998Based on our careful review of the record, we cannot say that the trial court’s decision to authorize the administration of the medication was manifestly erroneous or that there was any error committed that was “clearly evident, plain, and undisputable.” Kness , 277 Ill. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Lopez v. United States
green
1 sentence1974This point was covered in Lopez v. United States (1963), 373 U.S. 427, 438 , where the court said: “We need not be long detained by the belated claim that Davis should not have been permitted to testify about the conversation of October 24. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Thorn v. Watson
neutral
1 sentence1920Judy v. Kelley, 11 Ill. 211, 216 ; Thorn v. Watson, 10 Ill. 26 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Judy v. Kelley
green
1 sentence1920Judy v. Kelley, 11 Ill. 211, 216 ; Thorn v. Watson, 10 Ill. 26 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.