Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Citadel Holding Corp. v. Rovengreen2 sentences2025See also Tackett, 653 A.2d at 260 (“the disclosure of even a part of the contents of a privileged communication surrenders the privilege as to those communications” if partial disclosure would put the other party at a “distinct disadvantage.”) (quoting Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818, 825 (Del. 1992)). 19 Brown, 988 A.2d at 419 (citation omitted). 2015The emails between Mr. Harker and Mr. Tincher are 11 See D.RE. 510(a) (providing waiver occurs upon intentional disclosure of protected communications); Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818, 825 (Del. 1992) (“It is clear that the disclosure of even a part of the contents of a privileged communication surrenders the privilege as to those communications.”). 12 Interfaith Hous. | 2 | 4 |
Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Browngreen1 sentence2025See also Tackett, 653 A.2d at 260 (“the disclosure of even a part of the contents of a privileged communication surrenders the privilege as to those communications” if partial disclosure would put the other party at a “distinct disadvantage.”) (quoting Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818, 825 (Del. 1992)). 19 Brown, 988 A.2d at 419 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.green1 sentence2025See also Tackett, 653 A.2d at 260 (“the disclosure of even a part of the contents of a privileged communication surrenders the privilege as to those communications” if partial disclosure would put the other party at a “distinct disadvantage.”) (quoting Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818, 825 (Del. 1992)). 19 Brown, 988 A.2d at 419 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Interfaith Housing Delaware, Inc. v. Town of Georgetowngreen1 sentence2015Delaware, Inc. v. Town of Georgetown, 841 F. Supp. 1393, 1400 (D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texaco, Inc. v. Phoenix Steel Corporation
green
1 sentence1992D.R.E. 510; Texaco, Inc. v. Phoenix Steel Corp., Del.Ch., 264 A.2d 523 (1970). | 1 | 1992–1992 |