admiralty rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

admiralty rule in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Henry v. Windjammer Barefoot Cruises green
fladistctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2004However, our recent decision in Henry v. Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, 851 So.2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) has cast some confusion in the admiralty bar.

2004However, our recent decision in Henry v. Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, 851 So.2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) has cast some confusion in the admiralty bar.

22004–2004
Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England International Assurety of America, Inc. green
wawd · 1991
2 sentences

1997As stated by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Dudney, 595 So.2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), "Federal courts have recognized that ... strict construction of navigational limit warranties has been an established admiralty rule of the federal judiciary." Id. at 239 (citing Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England Int'l Assurety of America, Inc., 754 F.Supp. 816 (W.D.Wash.1991)); see also Home Ins.

1992Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, 754 F. Supp. at 819 .

21992–1997
Lexington Insurance Co. v. Cooke's Seafood, Snooper Fleet, Inc. green
ca11 · 1988
2 sentences

1997As stated by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Dudney, 595 So.2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), "Federal courts have recognized that ... strict construction of navigational limit warranties has been an established admiralty rule of the federal judiciary." Id. at 239 (citing Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England Int'l Assurety of America, Inc., 754 F.Supp. 816 (W.D.Wash.1991)); see also Home Ins.

1992Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, 754 F. Supp. at 819 .

21992–1997
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Dudney green
fladistctapp · 1992
2 sentences

1997As stated by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Dudney, 595 So.2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), "Federal courts have recognized that ... strict construction of navigational limit warranties has been an established admiralty rule of the federal judiciary." Id. at 239 (citing Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England Int'l Assurety of America, Inc., 754 F.Supp. 816 (W.D.Wash.1991)); see also Home Ins.

1997As stated by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Dudney, 595 So.2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), "Federal courts have recognized that ... strict construction of navigational limit warranties has been an established admiralty rule of the federal judiciary." Id. at 239 (citing Lexington v. Cooke's Seafood, 835 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir.1988); Port Lynch, Inc. v. New England Int'l Assurety of America, Inc., 754 F.Supp. 816 (W.D.Wash.1991)); see also Home Ins.

11997–1997
Holley v. Stansfield green
ca4 · 1959
1 sentence

1967In Holley v. The Mansfred Stansfield, 4th Cir.1959, 269 F.2d 317 , the court, in an astute opinion by Chief Judge Sobeloff, held that under the Virginia Wrongful Death Act [1] the admiralty doctrine of comparative negligence applied in the case of a wrongful death on the navigable waters of Virginia.

11967–1967

Where else courts name it

LA 17 (1969–2007) TX 8 (1977–2017) FL 5 (1967–2004) WA 5 (1944–2000) CA 5 (1945–1995) NY 5 (1939–2019) MD 3 (1938–1971) PA 2 (1947–2006) ID 2 (2021–2021) MI 2 (1977–2019) WY 2 (1989–1992) OH 2 (1951–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check