Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schramm v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., Schramm v. State, 414 So. 2d 295, 295 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) (remanding “to the trial court for correction of the apparent clerical error in the order of judgment and sentence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gatti v. State
green
2 sentences1981This Court remanded "with directions to the trial court to correct the apparent clerical error." See also Gatti v. State, 324 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975), upon which the Badger decision relied. 1981This is a variance which was addressed in Gatti v. State, 324 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we remand with directions to the trial court to correct the apparent clerical error. | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Melton v. State
green
1 sentence1989Melton v. State, 546 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Yates v. State
green
1 sentence1984Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla.2d DCA 1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.