Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hertz Corp. v. Piccologreen1 sentence2017See Hertz Corp., 453 So. 2d at 14 (“The controlling question therefore is whether the Louisiana direct action statute is substantive. | 1 | 1 |
Price v. McLeodgreen1 sentence2001As the Florida Supreme Court explained in City of Jacksonville v. Bowden, 67 Fla. 181 , 64 So. 769, 772 (1914): Where a statute does not violate the federal or state Constitution, the legislative will is supreme, and its policy is not subject to judicial review. | 1 | 1 |
Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.green1 sentence2000See Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co., 389 So.2d 999, 1001 (Fla.1980) (adopting the test from Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §§ 145, 146 (1969)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Abrahantes
green
1 sentence2017For example, this Court applied the test set forth in Bishop in Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Abrahantes, 517 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and concluded that, although the lawsuit was filed in Florida, Cayman Island law should have been applied, and therefore, the trial court’s failure to apply Cayman Island law was reversible error. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
City of Jacksonville v. Bowden
green
1 sentence2001As the Florida Supreme Court explained in City of Jacksonville v. Bowden, 67 Fla. 181 , 64 So. 769, 772 (1914): Where a statute does not violate the federal or state Constitution, the legislative will is supreme, and its policy is not subject to judicial review. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Nahar v. Nahar
green
1 sentence1995Id. § 6, at 9-10. [3] Without any cited authority or stated reasons, the court, however, holds that this statute "is not applicable to accounts [as here] established and closed before the effective date of the statute in 1988, particularly, where the deceased depositor died in 1984." 656 So.2d at 228 n. 8. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation
green
1 sentence1980E.g., Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 201 So.2d 743 (Fla. 1967). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.