Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nickerson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Nickerson v. State, 927 So. 2d 114, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("Generally speaking, a defendant need not be present or represented by counsel when the purpose of a resentencing is the performance of a ministerial-type function or the correction of a clerical error."). -2- Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error. | 1 | 1 |
Rodriguez v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Nickerson v. State, 927 So. 2d 114, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("Generally speaking, a defendant need not be present or represented by counsel when the purpose of a resentencing is the performance of a ministerial-type function or the correction of a clerical error."). -2- Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Smith v. State, 870 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Windisch v. State, 709 So.2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). | 1 | 1 |
Windisch v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Smith v. State, 870 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Windisch v. State, 709 So.2d 606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bolton v. Bolton
green
1 sentence2005In Bolton v. Bolton, 787 So.2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), this court had occasion to address a similar argument. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Pfeiffer v. State
green
1 sentence1992The First District Court of Appeal reached the same result in Pfeiffer v. State, 568 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Davenport v. State
neutral
1 sentence1980Similarly, in Baxley v. State, 317 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), the appellate court remanded for a correction of the record where the judgment showed that the defendant had pleaded guilty to two counts of robbery when he actually pleaded no contest to a single count of robbery. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.