Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1985–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Heifetz v. Dept. of Business Regulationgreen2 sentences1989Third, the legal standard which PERC was required to follow when reviewing the hearing officer's findings of fact was recently restated by the First District in Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation, 475 So.2d 1277, 1281-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985): "Section 120.57(1)(b)9, Florida Statutes (1983), mandates that an agency accept the factual determinations of a hearing officer unless those findings of fact are not based upon `competent substantial evidence.' A number of cases have defined the competent, substantial evidence standard. 1987Heifetz, 475 So.2d at 1281 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
De Groot v. Sheffield
green
2 sentences1989The seminal case is De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla. 1975), in which the Florida Supreme Court described it as `such evidence as will establish a substantial basis of fact from which the fact at issue can be reasonably inferred' or such evidence as is `sufficiently relevant and material that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached.' 95 So.2d at 916 . 1989The seminal case is De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla. 1975), in which the Florida Supreme Court described it as `such evidence as will establish a substantial basis of fact from which the fact at issue can be reasonably inferred' or such evidence as is `sufficiently relevant and material that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached.' 95 So.2d at 916 . | 2 | 1985–1989 |
DOT v. Groves-Watkins Constructors
green
1 sentence1992In short, the hearing officer's sole responsibility is to ascertain whether the agency acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally, or dishonestly. 530 So.2d at 914 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Ferris v. Turlington
green
1 sentence1991In this case the Commission had the burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence, see Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So.2d 292 (Fla. 1987), that Newberry had failed to maintain good moral character as defined in Rule 11B-27.0011(4), Florida Administrative Code. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.