5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saare v. Saaregreen1 sentence1995"The enhancement in value and appreciation of non-marital assets resulting from the efforts of either party during the marriage or from the contribution or expenditure of marital funds constitute marital assets of the parties." Saare v. Saare, 610 So.2d 628, 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). [W]here a party has separately owned property on which marital funds or labor were expended during the marriage, the value of the property at the time that it was acquired, together with any reasonable proration of the appreciated value that the party may show is attributable to causes other than the parties' contr | 1 | 1 |
Monroe Furniture Co. v. Bonnergreen1 sentence1995The claimant argues that the JCC did not use an inappropriate standard in applying the statute, relying upon the following language from Monroe Furniture Company v. Bonner, 509 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987): Accordingly, we conclude that section 440.15(3)(b)3.a., which terminates the right to wage-loss benefits after the passage of the requisite two-year statutory period unless during such time wage-loss benefits were payable for three consecutive months, can mean only that such benefits will be terminated if during the three-month term the worker’s post-injury income equals or exceeds | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hicks v. State
green
2 sentences2001Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). 1993Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 2 | 1993–2001 |
Gadson v. State
green
2 sentences2001Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). 1993Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 2 | 1993–2001 |
State v. Slappy
green
2 sentences2001Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). 1993Slappy, 522 So.2d at 23-24 ; Hicks v. State, 591 So.2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gadson v. State, 561 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 2 | 1993–2001 |
Spencer v. Spencer
green
1 sentence1992As did the First District Court of Appeal in Spencer v. Spencer, 590 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), concerning an award of rehabilitative alimony which was reversed, we conclude in this case concerning permanent periodic alimony that [w]hile a short marriage alone does not preclude an award of ... alimony, the record in the present case provides no *216 support for the notion that the wife is without the means of self support, as a result of anything that has transpired during the marriage. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.