Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Container Corp. of America v. Md. Cas. Co.green1 sentence2021Co., 707 So. 2d 733, 736 (Fla. 1998) (Where “policy language is susceptible to differing interpretations, it . . . should be construed in favor of the insured.”) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Sabbath v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2007See Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 , 591 n. 8, 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) (holding that the exceptions to the common law knock-and-announce rule also applied to 18 U.S.C. § 3109 "since they existed at common law, of which the statute is a codification"). 2007See Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 , 591 n. 8, 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) (holding that the exceptions to the common law knock-and-announce rule also applied to 18 U.S.C. § 3109 "since they existed at common law, of which the statute is a codification"). | 1 | 1 |
Temple Emanu-El v. Tremarco Industriesgreen1 sentence2006A mere reference to another document is not sufficient to incorporate that other document into a contract, particularly where the incorporating document makes no specific reference that it is `subject to' the collateral document." Temple Emanu-El of Greater Fort Lauderdale v. Tremarco Indus., Inc., 705 So.2d 983, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Kantner v. Boutin, 624 So.2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)). | 1 | 1 |
Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros.green1 sentence1987See Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros., Inc., 75 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1954); Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph Langner, Inc., 43 So.2d 335 (Fla. 1949). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kantner v. Boutin
green
1 sentence2006A mere reference to another document is not sufficient to incorporate that other document into a contract, particularly where the incorporating document makes no specific reference that it is `subject to' the collateral document." Temple Emanu-El of Greater Fort Lauderdale v. Tremarco Indus., Inc., 705 So.2d 983, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Kantner v. Boutin, 624 So.2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Robinson v. State
green
1 sentence2001Rule 3.170( l ) provides: "A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere without expressly reserving the right to appeal a legally dispositive issue may file a motion to withdraw the plea within thirty days after rendition of the sentence, but only upon the grounds specified in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(B)(i)-(v)." [1] (Emphasis added.) The incorporation of rule 9.140(b)(2)(B)(i)(v) accurately reflects the limited right of appeal that a defendant who enters a plea has and the issues identified in Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), which may be raised on direc | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph Langner
green
1 sentence1987See Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros., Inc., 75 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1954); Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph Langner, Inc., 43 So.2d 335 (Fla. 1949). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.