5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1930–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.green2 sentences1931In Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co., 95 Fla. 580 , 116 So. 449 , certain provisions of Chapter 12016, Acts of 1927, sought' to authorize the appropriation of State funds to pay taxes levied upon lands not owned by the State, the proceeds of the tax levy to be used in paying district drainage bonds; and such provisions were held to be an indirect violation of the intent of section 6, Article IX, constitution. 1930See Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co., 95 Fla. 530 , 116 So. | 1 | 2 |
Rowe v. Stategreen2 sentences1963See Gordon v. State, supra, Rowe v. State, 1924, 87 Fla. 17 , 98 So. 613 ; Milton v. State, Fla.App. 1961, 127 So.2d 460 . 1963See Gordon v. State, supra, Rowe v. State, 1924, 87 Fla. 17 , 98 So. 613 ; Milton v. State, Fla.App. 1961, 127 So.2d 460 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Swinscoe v. State, Department of Revenue
green
1 sentence2002The department also argues that appellant’s complaint is either a straight declaratory judgment action for statutory interpretation, or an indirect challenge to “the department’s time-barred assessment.” In Swinscoe v. State, Department of Revenue, 320 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. dismissed, 337 So.2d 976 (Fla.1976) the taxpayers filed suit in Broward County seeking to enjoin the department from collecting certain documentary stamp taxes. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lane v. State
green
1 sentence2002The department also argues that appellant’s complaint is either a straight declaratory judgment action for statutory interpretation, or an indirect challenge to “the department’s time-barred assessment.” In Swinscoe v. State, Department of Revenue, 320 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. dismissed, 337 So.2d 976 (Fla.1976) the taxpayers filed suit in Broward County seeking to enjoin the department from collecting certain documentary stamp taxes. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Robinson v. State
green
1 sentence1998Although this may be viewed as an indirect challenge to the voluntary and intelligent character of the defendant’s plea, pursuant to Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), there is no indication in the record that there was an effort by defendant to withdraw the plea prior to entry of the judgment and sentence on direct appeal. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Milton v. State
green
1 sentence1963See Gordon v. State, supra, Rowe v. State, 1924, 87 Fla. 17 , 98 So. 613 ; Milton v. State, Fla.App. 1961, 127 So.2d 460 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Cheney v. Jones
green
1 sentence1930As held in Cheney v. J ones, 14 Fla. 587 , revenues raised under Section 2, Article IX, Constitution, for State expenses cannot be used for expenses that ar'e forbidden by the Constitution; and as Section 6, Article IX, in effect forbids the issue of State bonds for road construction, by intendment such organic provision forbids the use of State revenues raised under Section 2, Article IX, to pay bonds that are forbidden to be issued by the State, the payment of county bonds issued for road construction with State revenues would be an evasion of, and an indirect violation of, the intent of Sec | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.