party prevails claim (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

party prevails claim in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe green
fla · 1985
2 sentences

1998However, as explained in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), “[t]he ‘results obtained’ may provide an independent basis for reducing the fee when the party prevails on a claim or claims for relief, but is unsuccessful on other unrelated claims.” Id. at 1151 .

1998However, as explained in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), “[t]he ‘results obtained’ may provide an independent basis for reducing the fee when the party prevails on a claim or claims for relief, but is unsuccessful on other unrelated claims.” Id. at 1151 .

41988–1998
Fashion Tile & Marble, Inc. v. Alpha One Const. & Associates, Inc. green
fladistctapp · 1988
1 sentence

2011As noted in Fashion Tile & Marble, Inc. v. Alpha One Constr. & Associates, Inc., 532 So.2d 1306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), The results obtained factor may provide an independent basis for reducing the lodestar when a party prevails on a claim or claims for relief but is unsuccessful on other unrelated claims.

12011–2011
Lee County v. Tohari green
fladistctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1998Appellee argues that “results obtained” may be used to enhance as well as decrease the lodestar fee and cites to our statement in Lee County v. Tohari, 582 So.2d 104 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), that “[i]n Quan-strom and Rowe , the supreme court recognized that the lodestar fee can be adjusted upward or downward for both a contingency risk factor and a ‘results obtained’ factor.” This dicta is an interpretation of the supreme court’s statement in Rowe that “[o]nce the court arrives at the lodestar figure, it may add or subtract from the fee based upon a ‘contingency risk’ factor and the ‘results obtain

11998–1998

Where else courts name it

TX 8 (2004–2026) FL 5 (1988–2011) OR 2 (2014–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check