Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ticktin v. Kearingreen1 sentence2025Delay alone in asserting a right does not constitute laches, and the burden is on the party who asserts the doctrine of laches to prove prejudice.” Ticktin v. Kearin, 807 So. 2d 659, 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). 4 The general magistrate’s recommended order also referred generally to rule 12.120 (governing the pleading of special matters) and cited the case of Parra Del Rey v. Rey, 114 So. 3d 371, 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), a case stating the general proposition that a failure to plead an affirmative defense 4 But a party needs to file an answer and affirmative defenses only in response to a pleading. | 1 | 1 |
Parra de Rey v. Reygreen1 sentence2025Delay alone in asserting a right does not constitute laches, and the burden is on the party who asserts the doctrine of laches to prove prejudice.” Ticktin v. Kearin, 807 So. 2d 659, 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). 4 The general magistrate’s recommended order also referred generally to rule 12.120 (governing the pleading of special matters) and cited the case of Parra Del Rey v. Rey, 114 So. 3d 371, 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), a case stating the general proposition that a failure to plead an affirmative defense 4 But a party needs to file an answer and affirmative defenses only in response to a pleading. | 1 | 1 |
Stephenson v. Stephensongreen1 sentence2001See Stephenson v. Stephenson, 52 So.2d 684 (Fla.1951); State, Dept. of Revenue By and on Behalf of Taylor v. David, 684 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Lemaster, 596 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States Government
green
2 sentences2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) ("The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim...."). 2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) (“The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim.... ”). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
National Elevator Industry, Inc. v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
green
2 sentences2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) ("The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim...."). 2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) (“The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim.... ”). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Adam v. Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States & Canada
green
2 sentences2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) ("The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim...."). 2011Reynolds v. von Bulow by Auersperg, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States, 768 F.2d 719 , 721 (5th Cir.1985) ("The burden of establishing that a document is work product is on the party who asserts the claim...."). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE BY TAYLOR v. David
green
1 sentence2001See Stephenson v. Stephenson, 52 So.2d 684 (Fla.1951); State, Dept. of Revenue By and on Behalf of Taylor v. David, 684 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Lemaster, 596 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
STATE, DHRS v. Lemaster
green
1 sentence2001See Stephenson v. Stephenson, 52 So.2d 684 (Fla.1951); State, Dept. of Revenue By and on Behalf of Taylor v. David, 684 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Lemaster, 596 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Randy Intern., Ltd. v. American Excess Corp.
green
1 sentence1991Trushing v City of Miami Beach, 328 So.2d 27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Randy Itern, Ltd. v American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v Town of Sweetwater, 112 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1959). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Town of Sweetwater
green
1 sentence1991Trushing v City of Miami Beach, 328 So.2d 27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Randy Itern, Ltd. v American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v Town of Sweetwater, 112 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1959). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Trushin v. City of Miami Beach
green
1 sentence1991Trushing v City of Miami Beach, 328 So.2d 27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Randy Itern, Ltd. v American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v Town of Sweetwater, 112 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1959). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin
green
2 sentences1982Mobil Oil Corporation v. Shevin, 354 So.2d 372 (Fla.1977). 1982The rule in Mobil Oil Corporation v. Shevin, 354 So.2d 372 (Fla.1977) as stated by the majority is that a party who asserts the doctrine of collateral estoppel must show that the issue was fully litigated between the parties. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.