Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ashley v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 2003) (oral pronouncement controls over written document). | 1 | 1 |
Bover v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See id. at 1251 n. 5. (recognizing limitations of rule 3.800(a) proceeding, including its general prohibition against evi-dentiary hearings); Gray v. State, 837 So.2d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Evansgreen2 sentences2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had 2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 1 |
State v. Niblackgreen2 sentences2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had 2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 1 |
In re Amendment of Rules of Civil & Criminal Procedure: Sections 971.07 & 971.08, Statsgreen2 sentences2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had 2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Spicuzzagreen1 sentence2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 1 |
State v. Buckalewgreen1 sentence2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
D.A.H. v. State
green
1 sentence2018Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Gray v. State
green
1 sentence2011See id. at 1251 n. 5. (recognizing limitations of rule 3.800(a) proceeding, including its general prohibition against evi-dentiary hearings); Gray v. State, 837 So.2d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Cobbs
green
2 sentences2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had 2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Hoff
green
1 sentence2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Gibbons
green
1 sentence2000See also State v. Niblack, 220 Conn. 270 , 596 A.2d 407 (1991) (approving procedure followed in reaching a plea agreement where "[t]he judge was responsible for conducting plea negotiations and, if an agreement was reached, for holding a plea and sentencing hearing [ ... but if] negotiations were not successful ... a judge who was not involved in the plea negotiations would have presided at trial and pronounced sentence if the defendant were found guilty"); People v. Cobbs, 443 Mich. 276 , 505 N.W.2d 208 (1993)(modifying rules governing judicial participation in sentence discussions, which had | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1991Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.