Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gazil, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc.green2 sentences1991Id. at 313 . 1990See generally Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. at 210 , 97 S.Ct. at 2582-83 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 701-02 . [5] Unique Caterers was modified with respect to the nature of the requirement for a post-seizure hearing in Gazil, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc., 356 So.2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1978). [6] We need not reach Hordis' alternative contention that it was an abuse of discretion to issue a writ of attachment on Hordis' other property where Sentinel had already retained a security interest in the goods sold which are the subject of the underlying lawsuit. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Rutherfordgreen1 sentence1999Although in State v. Rutherford, 707 So.2d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 718 So.2d 171 (Fla.1998), we held that a patient's medical records are protected under article I, section 23, of the Florida Constitution, the records sought to be produced in Rutherford were held by the health care provider, the hospital. | 1 | 1 |
S & G PRESS, INC. v. Harris Graphics Corp.green1 sentence1990See S & G Press, Inc. v. Harris Graphics Corp., 718 F. Supp. 1459, 1460 (N.D.Cal. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Shaffer v. Heitnergreen2 sentences1990See generally Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. at 210 , 97 S.Ct. at 2582-83 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 701-02 . [5] Unique Caterers was modified with respect to the nature of the requirement for a post-seizure hearing in Gazil, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc., 356 So.2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1978). [6] We need not reach Hordis' alternative contention that it was an abuse of discretion to issue a writ of attachment on Hordis' other property where Sentinel had already retained a security interest in the goods sold which are the subject of the underlying lawsuit. 1990See generally Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. at 210 , 97 S.Ct. at 2582-83 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 701-02 . [5] Unique Caterers was modified with respect to the nature of the requirement for a post-seizure hearing in Gazil, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc., 356 So.2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1978). [6] We need not reach Hordis' alternative contention that it was an abuse of discretion to issue a writ of attachment on Hordis' other property where Sentinel had already retained a security interest in the goods sold which are the subject of the underlying lawsuit. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Viatical Services, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004In Viatical, we directed the trial court on remand to "issue the warrant on condition that the insured's medical records be sealed until a post-seizure hearing may be held on the issue of the right to privacy." 741 So.2d at 564 . 2004We directed the trial court "to issue the warrant on condition that the insured's medical records be sealed until a post-seizure hearing may be held on the issue of the right of privacy." Id. | 2 | 2004–2005 |
State v. Laiser
green
1 sentence1991It is unnecessary to reach the question of an entitlement to a post-seizure hearing for three reasons: (1) it was not raised by the petitioner and was not a basis for the circuit court's decision, (2) there were no other exigent circumstances to warrant a hearing such as a pendency of related criminal charges, compare State v. Laiser, 322 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1975), and (3) there was a post-seizure hearing where the county court found that the petitioner did not have a permit to possess the alligator. [3] Our conclusion on the constitutional claim does not dispose of the case to a finality. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.