Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1958–1979 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchiogreen2 sentences1972There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit." [8] South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 107 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1958): "In view of the inherent authority of the court to see to it that its own mandates are properly complied with we have consistently taken jurisdiction of matters of this nature even though in particular cases the order of the trial court under assault would not otherwise fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of this court." [9] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [10] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [11] Weeks v. Weeks, 143 Fla. 686 , 1972There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit." [8] South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 107 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1958): "In view of the inherent authority of the court to see to it that its own mandates are properly complied with we have consistently taken jurisdiction of matters of this nature even though in particular cases the order of the trial court under assault would not otherwise fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of this court." [9] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [10] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [11] Weeks v. Weeks, 143 Fla. 686 , | 1 | 1 |
South Dade Farms v. Petersgreen1 sentence1972There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit." [8] South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 107 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1958): "In view of the inherent authority of the court to see to it that its own mandates are properly complied with we have consistently taken jurisdiction of matters of this nature even though in particular cases the order of the trial court under assault would not otherwise fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of this court." [9] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [10] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [11] Weeks v. Weeks, 143 Fla. 686 , | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beverly Beach Properties v. Nelson
green
2 sentences1979Beverly Beach Properties, Inc. v. Nelson, 68 So.2d 604 (Fla.1953); Rowland v. Whitehead, 375 So.2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). 1967Mr. Justice Roberts, who wrote the Supreme Court’s opinion in the Strazzulla case, commented on divergent opinions that had been written in Florida on the law of the case, etc. In his opinion, page 3, Justice Roberts said: “In 1953 the decision in Beverly Beach Properties v. Nelson, supra, 68 So.2d 604 , was rendered. | 3 | 1962–1979 |
Rowland v. Whitehead
green
1 sentence1979Beverly Beach Properties, Inc. v. Nelson, 68 So.2d 604 (Fla.1953); Rowland v. Whitehead, 375 So.2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Weeks v. Weeks
green
2 sentences1972There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit." [8] South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 107 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1958): "In view of the inherent authority of the court to see to it that its own mandates are properly complied with we have consistently taken jurisdiction of matters of this nature even though in particular cases the order of the trial court under assault would not otherwise fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of this court." [9] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [10] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [11] Weeks v. Weeks, 143 Fla. 686 , 1972There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit." [8] South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 107 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1958): "In view of the inherent authority of the court to see to it that its own mandates are properly complied with we have consistently taken jurisdiction of matters of this nature even though in particular cases the order of the trial court under assault would not otherwise fall within the constitutional jurisdiction of this court." [9] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [10] 143 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 1962). [11] Weeks v. Weeks, 143 Fla. 686 , | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Strazzulla v. Hendrick
green
1 sentence1967Consequently, we have the power to correct any error which the Chancellor or we may have heretofore made in the progress of this litigation. * * * ’ (Emphasis added.)” In the case of Strazzulla v. Hendrick, Fla. 1965, 177 So.2d 1 , our Supreme Court, on a petition for certiorari to review our decision in Hendrick v. Strazzulla, supra, held that a court has the power to reconsider and correct an erroneous ruling that has become the law of the case. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Rimmeir v. Dickson
green
1 sentence1958There is no question of res adjudicata because this is the same, not a new and different, suit.” . 78 So.2d 732, 734 . . 52 Am.Jur., Trademarks, Tradenames, Sec. 145, 147. . | 1 | 1958–1958 |