race-based challenge (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

race-based challenge in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Melbourne v. Stategreen
fla · 1996 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013In Melbourne v. State, the Florida Supreme Court set forth three mandatory steps for a race-based challenge to a peremptory strike. 679 So.2d 759, 764 (Fla.1996).

11
Fotopoulos v. Stategreen
fla · 1992 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Johnson v. California green
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2018Id. at 165 .

2018Id. at 165 .

22018–2018
Andrews v. Lakeshore Rehabilitation Hospital green
ca11 · 1998
1 sentence

2001Thus, Plaintiff's retaliation claim differs markedly from the retaliation claim in Little." Id.

12001–2001
State v. Neil green
fla · 1984
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
State v. Johans green
fla · 1993
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Telemaque v. State green
fladistctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Gilliam v. State green
fla · 1987
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Morgan v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Mack v. State green
fladistctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Williams v. State green
fladistctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Banks v. Ryan green
scotus · 1993
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Williams v. Collins green
scotus · 1993
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995
Cure v. State green
fladistctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1995NOTES [1] Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1987); Mack v. State, 620 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 619 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Morgan v. State, 603 So.2d 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Telemaque v. State, 591 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Cure v. State, 564 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). [2] State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984) (establishing test for determining whether a party is exercising a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner and prohibiting such a race-based challenge). [3] In view of our disposition, we need not reach appellant's argumen

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

FL 5 (1995–2018) CA 3 (2004–2014) VA 2 (1992–1993) IN 2 (2002–2016) NY 2 (2000–2009) TX 2 (2021–2021) OH 2 (2023–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check