required genuineness inquiry (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

required genuineness inquiry in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Hayes v. Stategreen
fla · 2012 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012In fact, “Florida’s appellate courts have fairly consistently reversed for a new trial where the record provides no indication that the trial court engaged in the required genuineness inquiry.” Id. (quoting Hayes, 94 So.3d at 463-64 ).

2012In fact, “Florida’s appellate courts have fairly consistently reversed for a new trial where the record provides no indication that the trial court engaged in the required genuineness inquiry.” Id. (quoting Hayes, 94 So.3d at 463-64 ).

12
Cook v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013There is nothing in the on-the-record exchange regarding the striking of the jurors reflecting that the court engaged in the required genuineness analysis.”); Cook v. State, 104 So.3d 1187, 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Since the trial court did not articulate any analysis on the record, and merely summarily ‘sustained] the strike’ of the state, we find that the trial court did not conduct the genuineness analysis of step three, as required by Mel bourne.”) (alteration in original).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Nowell v. State green
fla · 2008
2 sentences

2014And “where the record provides no indication that the trial court engaged in the required genuineness inquiry,” “Florida’s appellate courts have fairly consistently reversed for a new trial.” Id. 10 We reject the State’s argument that the trial court implicitly considered the genuineness of the proffered explanation.

2014And “where the record provides no indication that the trial court engaged in the required genuineness inquiry,” “Florida’s appellate courts have fairly consistently reversed for a new trial.” Id.

22014–2014

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check