benefit of seeing hearing (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

benefit of seeing hearing in Ohio

43 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Goodgreen
ohioctapp · 1997 · cited in 38 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1998–2008
2 sentences

2005"The trier of fact has the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify and is in the best position to determine the facts of the case." State v. Monroe (Sept. 21, 2000), Franklin App. No 99AP-1464, citing In re Good (1997), 118 Ohio App.3d 371 , 377 . {¶ 7} Testimony presented by the state is as follows.

1999The credibility of the witnesses are primarily issues to be decided by the trier of the fact because the trier of the fact "has the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify, and is in the best position to determine the facts of the case." In re Good (1997), 118 Ohio App.3d 371 , 377 .

138

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Burdine-Justice green
ohioctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2003Maccabee v. Maccabee (June 29, 1999), Franklin App. No. 98AP-1213, quoting State v. Burdine-Justice (1998), 125 Ohio App.3d 707 , 716 .

2002"The weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily issues to be decided by the trier of fact." State v. Burdine-Justice (1998), 125 Ohio App.3d 707 , 716 ; DeHass, supra. The trier of fact has the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify, and is in the best position to determine the facts of the case.

41999–2003
State v. Dehass green
ohio · 1967
2 sentences

2002Id.

2002"The weight to be given the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses are primarily issues to be decided by the trier of fact." State v. Burdine-Justice (1998), 125 Ohio App.3d 707 , 716 ; DeHass, supra. The trier of fact has the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify, and is in the best position to determine the facts of the case.

22002–2002
Blosser v. Carter green
ohioctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1998Blosser, 67 Ohio App. 3d at 220 ; State v. Purdon (Nov. 10, 1997), Brown App. No. CA97-03-009, unreported, at 3.

11998–1998
State v. Jenks red
ohio · 1991
2 sentences

1997The role of an appellate court is to “examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.” State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 273 , 574 N.E.2d 492, 503 .

1997The role of an appellate court is to “examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.” State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 273 , 574 N.E.2d 492, 503 .

11997–1997

Where else courts name it

OH 43 (1997–2008) NY 9 (1987–2019) IA 7 (1959–2019) AL 7 (1915–2018) PA 4 (1944–2010) MD 4 (1937–2004) NC 4 (1962–2020) FL 2 (1920–1972) NJ 2 (2007–2019) LA 2 (1985–1994) GA 2 (1986–2017) IL 2 (1925–1957) DC 2 (2000–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check