useful tool analysis (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

useful tool analysis in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Evangelical United Brethren Church v. State green
wash · 1965
2 sentences

2009In pursuance of this case-by-case method of proceeding, we commend utilization of the preliminary test iterated in Evangelical United Brethren Church v. State, supra, [ 67 Wash.2d 246 , 407 P.2d 440 (1965) ] as a useful tool for analysis.

2009In pursuance of this case-by-case method of proceeding, we commend utilization of the preliminary test iterated in Evangelical United Brethren Church v. State, supra, [ 67 Wash.2d 246 , 407 P.2d 440 (1965) ] as a useful tool for analysis.

51979–2009
Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty. green
fla · 1979
1 sentence

1985In pursuance of this case-by-case method of proceeding, we commend utilization of the preliminary test iterated in Evangelical United Brethren Church v. State, supra [ 67 Wash.2d 246 , 407 P.2d 440 (1965)], as a useful tool for analysis. 371 So.2d at 1022 .

11985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 768.28 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 5 (1979–2009) NM 2 (2013–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check