form of an affirmative defense (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

form of an affirmative defense in Georgia

5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Helton v. JASPER BANKING CO.green
gactapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014(Citation omitted.) Helton v. Jasper Banking Co., 311 Ga. App. 363, 364 ( 715 SE2d 765 ) (2011).

2014(Citation omitted.) Helton v. Jasper Banking Co., 311 Ga. App. 363, 364 ( 715 SE2d 765 ) (2011).

22
Georgia Investments International, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.green
gactapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ga. Investments Intl. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 305 Ga. App. 673, 675 (1) ( 700 SE2d 662 ) (2010).

2011(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ga. Investments Intl. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 305 Ga. App. 673, 675 (1) ( 700 SE2d 662 ) (2010).

11
Gentile v. Bowergreen
gactapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010For purposes of summary judgment, although the movant might satisfy its original burden of showing a prima facie right to recover, “if the respondent successfully produces . . . rebuttal evidence in the form of an affirmative defense, the burden shifts back to the movant to establish the non-existence of a genuine issue of fact as to each affirmative defense.” (Citation omitted.) Gentile v. Bower, 222 Ga. App. 736, 737 ( 477 SE2d 130 ) (1996).

2010For purposes of summary judgment, although the movant might satisfy its original burden of showing a prima facie right to recover, “if the respondent successfully produces . . . rebuttal evidence in the form of an affirmative defense, the burden shifts back to the movant to establish the non-existence of a genuine issue of fact as to each affirmative defense.” (Citation omitted.) Gentile v. Bower, 222 Ga. App. 736, 737 ( 477 SE2d 130 ) (1996).

11
Abdalla v. DDCB, INC.green
gactapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Abdalla v. DDCB, Inc., 216 Ga. App. 667, 668 ( 455 SE2d 598 ) (1995).

1996Abdalla v. DDCB, Inc., 216 Ga. App. 667, 668 ( 455 SE2d 598 ) (1995).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

GA 5 (1996–2014) NY 2 (1964–2010) CT 2 (2024–2024) CA 2 (2019–2025) IL 2 (1992–1996) NJ 2 (1990–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check