5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garza v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Garza, 284 Ga. at 702 (1). 2013Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696, 702 (1) ( 670 SE2d 73 ) (2008); see also Bryant, supra, 304 Ga. App. at 756-757 (1), n.1. | 2 | 2 |
Bryant v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696, 702 (1) ( 670 SE2d 73 ) (2008); see also Bryant, supra, 304 Ga. App. at 756-757 (1), n.1. 2013Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696, 702 (1) ( 670 SE2d 73 ) (2008); see also Bryant, supra, 304 Ga. App. at 756-757 (1), n.1. | 1 | 1 |
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diegogreen1 sentence2007See Metromedia [v. City of San Diego, 453 U. S. 490 (101 SC 2882, 69 LE2d 800) (1981)] and Central Hudson Gas & Elec. | 1 | 1 |
Tripp v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See generally Tripp v. State, 276 Ga. 104 ( 575 SE2d 507 ) (2003). (a) The record supports the trial court’s finding that the length of the delay consisted of the six-month period between Hudson’s arrest in July 1996 and the motion for a continuance filed by his attorney in January 1997 and the nine-month period between June 1997 (when the last defense motion for continuance expired) and March 1998, when trial was had. 4 (b) As to the reason for the delay, the initial delay (through May 1997) must be weighed against Hudson because it was due to change in counsel and continuance motions filed o 2004See generally Tripp v. State, 276 Ga. 104 ( 575 SE2d 507 ) (2003). (a) The record supports the trial court’s finding that the length of the delay consisted of the six-month period between Hudson’s arrest in July 1996 and the motion for a continuance filed by his attorney in January 1997 and the nine-month period between June 1997 (when the last defense motion for continuance expired) and March 1998, when trial was had. 4 (b) As to the reason for the delay, the initial delay (through May 1997) must be weighed against Hudson because it was due to change in counsel and continuance motions filed o | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kelly
green
2 sentences2018As Mitchell concedes, however, because appellant's trial counsel did not object and ask the court for a curative instruction, a plain error analysis applies under the four part test outlined in State v. Kelly , 290 Ga. 29 , 33 (2) (a), 718 S.E.2d 232 (2011). 2018As Mitchell concedes, however, because appellant's trial counsel did not object and ask the court for a curative instruction, a plain error analysis applies under the four part test outlined in State v. Kelly , 290 Ga. 29 , 33 (2) (a), 718 S.E.2d 232 (2011). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
green
1 sentence2007Corp. v. [Public Service Comm. of New York], 447 U. S. 557 [(100 SC 2343, 65 LE2d 341)] (1980)____After review of the Fulton County Sign Ordinance at issue, in light of the four part test under Central Hudson and its progeny, this Court finds that it is unconstitutional____By creating content based exceptions to the ban on off-premise signage, the County has violated the strictures of the First Amendment, as set forth in Central Hudson and its progeny. . . . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
1 sentence2004The trial court properly analyzed Hudson’s contention that he was denied his right to a speedy trial under the four part test set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 (92 SC 2182, 33 LE2d 101) (1972). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.