Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1922–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rivers v. Haileygreen2 sentences1998Even assuming, arguendo, that appellants have a property right in their appointed offices, Fulton v. Baker, 261 Ga. 710, n. 3 ( 410 SE2d 735 ) (1991), [i]t is the general and well-recognized rule that the authority which possesses the power to create an office has, in the absence of some provision of law passed by a higher authority, the implied power to abolish the office it has created. [Cits.] Rivers v. Hailey, 199 Ga. 38, 39 (1) ( 33 SE2d 310 ) (1945). 1998Even assuming, arguendo, that appellants have a property right in their appointed offices, Fulton v. Baker, 261 Ga. 710, n. 3 ( 410 SE2d 735 ) (1991), [i]t is the general and well-recognized rule that the authority which possesses the power to create an office has, in the absence of some provision of law passed by a higher authority, the implied power to abolish the office it has created. [Cits.] Rivers v. Hailey, 199 Ga. 38, 39 (1) ( 33 SE2d 310 ) (1945). | 2 | 2 |
Fulton v. Bakergreen2 sentences1998Even assuming, arguendo, that appellants have a property right in their appointed offices, Fulton v. Baker, 261 Ga. 710, n. 3 ( 410 SE2d 735 ) (1991), [i]t is the general and well-recognized rule that the authority which possesses the power to create an office has, in the absence of some provision of law passed by a higher authority, the implied power to abolish the office it has created. [Cits.] Rivers v. Hailey, 199 Ga. 38, 39 (1) ( 33 SE2d 310 ) (1945). 1998Even assuming, arguendo, that appellants have a property right in their appointed offices, Fulton v. Baker, 261 Ga. 710, n. 3 ( 410 SE2d 735 ) (1991), [i]t is the general and well-recognized rule that the authority which possesses the power to create an office has, in the absence of some provision of law passed by a higher authority, the implied power to abolish the office it has created. [Cits.] Rivers v. Hailey, 199 Ga. 38, 39 (1) ( 33 SE2d 310 ) (1945). | 1 | 2 |
City Council v. Sweeneygreen1 sentence1945City Council of Augusta v. Sweeney, 44 Ga. 463, 465 (9 Am. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Simon v. City of Atlanta
green
1 sentence1924Citing Simon v. Atlanta, 67 Ga. 618 (44 Am. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Mosteller v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1922It is not made to appear that this general and well-recognized rule would be inapplicable to this case because of any such peculiar and particular state of facts as existed and controlled the ruling in Pannell v. McGarity, 27 Ga. App. 71 ( 107 S. E. 352 ). | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Pannell v. McGarity
neutral
1 sentence1922It is not made to appear that this general and well-recognized rule would be inapplicable to this case because of any such peculiar and particular state of facts as existed and controlled the ruling in Pannell v. McGarity, 27 Ga. App. 71 ( 107 S. E. 352 ). | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.