Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ford Motor Co. v. Younggreen2 sentences2013Accordingly, Kemp’s motion to dismiss Case No. A13A1418 is denied. (b) Having so determined our jurisdiction, we turn to the disqualification itself. 5 See id. at 351 . 6 (Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 352 (1) (a). 7 Id. 8 Pursuant to OCGA § 15-1-3 (4), [e]very court has power to control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers and all other persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto. 2013Accordingly, Kemp’s motion to dismiss Case No. A13A1418 is denied. (b) Having so determined our jurisdiction, we turn to the disqualification itself. 5 See id. at 351 . 6 (Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 352 (1) (a). 7 Id. 8 Pursuant to OCGA § 15-1-3 (4), [e]very court has power to control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers and all other persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto. | 1 | 1 |
Neal v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 569-572 ( 722 SE2d 765 ) (2012) (Hunstein, C. 2013See Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 569-572 ( 722 SE2d 765 ) (2012) (Hunstein, C. | 1 | 1 |
Grizzard v. Stategreen2 sentences2012For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand with direction. “[W]e review the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on speedy trial grounds for abuse of discretion and defer to the trial court’s findings of fact and its weighing of disputed facts.” (Citations and footnote omitted.) Grizzard v. State, 301 Ga. App. 613, 614 ( 688 SE2d 402 ) (2009). 2012For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand with direction. “[W]e review the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on speedy trial grounds for abuse of discretion and defer to the trial court’s findings of fact and its weighing of disputed facts.” (Citations and footnote omitted.) Grizzard v. State, 301 Ga. App. 613, 614 ( 688 SE2d 402 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martinez v. Housing Authority
green
2 sentences2016Martinez, supra. These issues, however, are unripe prior to a determination on the validity of Kemp’s claim. 2016Martinez, supra. These issues, however, are unripe prior to a determination on the validity of Kemp’s claim. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.