Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1969–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Virgil v. Kapplingreen2 sentences1992(E)ven if the doctrine of laches could be invoked in a suit at law, it could not be invoked during the period during which a statute of limitation would be applicable.’ ” Virgil v. Kapplin, 187 Ga. App. 206, 208 (4) ( 369 SE2d 808 ). 1992(E)ven if the doctrine of laches could be invoked in a suit at law, it could not be invoked during the period during which a statute of limitation would be applicable.’ ” Virgil v. Kapplin, 187 Ga. App. 206, 208 (4) ( 369 SE2d 808 ). | 2 | 2 |
Columbus Bank & Trust Co. v. Dempseygreen2 sentences1997Co. v. Dempsey, 120 Ga. App. 5, 6 ( 169 SE2d 349 ) (1969).” Virgil v. Kapplin, 187 Ga. App. 206, 208 (4) ( 369 SE2d 808 ) (1988). 1997Co. v. Dempsey, 120 Ga. App. 5, 6 ( 169 SE2d 349 ) (1969).” Virgil v. Kapplin, 187 Ga. App. 206, 208 (4) ( 369 SE2d 808 ) (1988). | 2 | 2 |
Kenerly v. Bryantgreen2 sentences2024Even if the doctrine of laches could be invoked in such actions, it could not be invoked during the period during which a statute of limitation would be applicable.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Kenerly v. Bryant, 227 Ga. App. 746, 748 (2) ( 490 SE2d 454 ) (1997). 2024Even if the doctrine of laches could be invoked in such actions, it could not be invoked during the period during which a statute of limitation would be applicable.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Kenerly v. Bryant, 227 Ga. App. 746, 748 (2) ( 490 SE2d 454 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Dunn v. Dunngreen2 sentences1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. 1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. | 1 | 1 |
Fletcher v. Gillespiegreen2 sentences1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. 1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Louther v. Tift
neutral
1 sentence1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Flowery Branch Gin & Oil Co. v. Shore
neutral
1 sentence1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
City of Albany v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1969In addition to the case of City of Albany v. Mitchell, 81 Ga. App. 408 , supra, see also Louther v. Tift, 20 Ga. App. 309 (2) ( 93 SE 70 ); Fletcher v. Gillespie, 201 Ga. 377, 385 ( 40 SE2d 45 ); Dunn v. Dunn, 221 Ga. 368, 372 ( 144 SE2d 758 ); 30A CJS 28, 29, Equity, § 113, and cases cited under Footnotes 4 and 4.5; Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Ed., Yol. 5, (Rev. 1968) Sec. 15.556, and cases cited under Footnote No. 15 at page 506. | 1 | 1969–1969 |