5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1914–1948 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Pattersongreen1 sentence1931See, in this connection, Jones v. Patterson, 138 Ga. 863 ( 76 S. E. 378 ); Scott v. Davis, 22 Ga. App. 33 ( 95 S. E. 332 ). | 1 | 1 |
Rooks v. Tindallgreen1 sentence1931See, in this connection, Jones v. Patterson, 138 Ga. 863 ( 76 S. E. 378 ); Scott v. Davis, 22 Ga. App. 33 ( 95 S. E. 332 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cohen v. Meyers, Cohen & Co.
neutral
2 sentences1948Cohen v. Meyers , 42 Ga. 46 ; Pendleton v. Johnson , 85 Ga. 840 ( 11 S.E. 144 ); Goodroe v. C. 1948Cohen v. Meyers, 42 Ga. 46 ; Pendleton v. Johnson, 85 Ga. 840 ( 11 S. E. 144 ); Goodroe v. C. | 2 | 1948–1948 |
Pendleton Bros. v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences1948Cohen v. Meyers, 42 Ga. 46 ; Pendleton v. Johnson, 85 Ga. 840 ( 11 S. E. 144 ); Goodroe v. C. 1948Cohen v. Meyers, 42 Ga. 46 ; Pendleton v. Johnson, 85 Ga. 840 ( 11 S. E. 144 ); Goodroe v. C. | 2 | 1948–1948 |
Bank of Jonesboro v. Wilson
neutral
2 sentences1934Any administration upon the estate of a living person is void; and while it is true that the presumption of death arising from a person’s absence, unheard from for a considerable length of time, may present a prima facie case sufficient to warrant a grant of administration on his estate, the arising of such presumption does not take the case out of the operation of the general rule on the subject, and if it is made to appear that the person was in fact alive at the time such administration was granted, the administration is absolutely void.” Bank of Jonesboro v. Wilson, 43 Ga. App. 839 ( 160 S 1934Any administration upon the estate of a living person is void; and while it is true that the presumption of death arising from a person’s absence, unheard from for a considerable length of time, may present a prima facie case sufficient to warrant a grant of administration on his estate, the arising of such presumption does not take the case out of the operation of the general rule on the subject, and if it is made to appear that the person was in fact alive at the time such administration was granted, the administration is absolutely void.” Bank of Jonesboro v. Wilson, 43 Ga. App. 839 ( 160 S | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Scott v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1931See, in this connection, Jones v. Patterson, 138 Ga. 863 ( 76 S. E. 378 ); Scott v. Davis, 22 Ga. App. 33 ( 95 S. E. 332 ). | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Bank of Cumming v. Mason
neutral
1 sentence1931See, in this connection, Jones v. Patterson, 138 Ga. 863 ( 76 S. E. 378 ); Scott v. Davis, 22 Ga. App. 33 ( 95 S. E. 332 ). | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Brown v. State
neutral
1 sentence1914Suffice it to say, as held in Bishop v. Bishop, 124 Ga. 397 ( 52 S. E. 745 ) : “Public policy forbids that a husband [or wife] should be permitted to thus testify,” even where no objection is made to such testimony or where there is an agreement to receive it. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.