operation of the general rule (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

operation of the general rule in Missouri

7 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1877–1987 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

CaseCitedYears
Meechum v. Judy neutral
mo · 1836
2 sentences

1987Judy, 4 Mo. 361 and 540; Faber vs.

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

21891–1987
Royster v. Baker green
mo · 1963
1 sentence

1965In view of this admittedly applicable general rule the problem upon this appeal is whether, construing the appellant’s petition as it must be viewed upon a motion to dismiss (Royster v. Baker, Mo., 365 S.W.2d 496, 500 ), there are any allegations which would prima facie remove the cause from the operation of the general rule and therefore entitle him to a hearing of the cause upon its merits.

11965–1965
Faber v. Bruner green
mo · 1850
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
Jacob v. McLean neutral
mo · 1856
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
Eidemiller v. Kump neutral
mo · 1875
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
State ex rel. Reid v. Griffith green
mo · 1876
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
Bullock v. Cook neutral
moctapp · 1887
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
Wight v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. neutral
moctapp · 1886
1 sentence

1891State ex rel. v. Griffith, 63 Mo. 545 ; Meechem v. Judy, 4 Mo. 361 -540; Faber v. Bruner, 13 Mo. 541 ; Eidemiller v. Kump, 61 Mo. 340 ; Jacob v. McLean, 24 Mo. 40 ; Bullock v. Cook, 28 Mo. App. 222 ; Kent v. Hamilton, 23 Mo. App. 619 ; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 28 ; Wright v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 481 .

11891–1891
Deardorff v. Everhartt green
mo · 1881
1 sentence

1888It is also held in Deardorff v. Everhartt ( 74 Mo. 37 ) that the agreed prices between the contractor and the subcontractor will be received as prima-facie evidence of the market value.

11888–1888
Hilliker v. Francisco neutral
· 1877
1 sentence

1888This, according to the decision in Hilliker v. Francisco ( 65 Mo. 598 ), qualifies the operation of the general rule, and holds the owner to the prices of the materials, or to the aggregate sum charged for them, in the contract between the contractor and the subcontractor.

11888–1888
Hipsley v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad neutral
mo · 1885
1 sentence

1887Lemon v. C hanslor, 68 Mo. 341 ; Hipsley v. Railroad, 88 Mo. 348 .

11887–1887
Fish v. Howland green
nychanct · 1828
1 sentence

1877Emison v. Whittlesy, 55 Mo. 254 ; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Durette v. Briggs, 47 Mo. 362 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 40 Mo. 90 ; Delassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 212 ; Griffin v. Blanchar, 17 Cal. 70 ; 1 Ld.

11877–1877
Delassus v. Poston neutral
mo · 1854
1 sentence

1877Emison v. Whittlesy, 55 Mo. 254 ; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Durette v. Briggs, 47 Mo. 362 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 40 Mo. 90 ; Delassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 212 ; Griffin v. Blanchar, 17 Cal. 70 ; 1 Ld.

11877–1877
Adams v. Buchanan green
mo · 1871
1 sentence

1877Emison v. Whittlesy, 55 Mo. 254 ; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Durette v. Briggs, 47 Mo. 362 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 40 Mo. 90 ; Delassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 212 ; Griffin v. Blanchar, 17 Cal. 70 ; 1 Ld.

11877–1877
Emison v. Whittlesey neutral
mo · 1874
1 sentence

1877Emison v. Whittlesy, 55 Mo. 254 ; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Durette v. Briggs, 47 Mo. 362 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 40 Mo. 90 ; Delassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 212 ; Griffin v. Blanchar, 17 Cal. 70 ; 1 Ld.

11877–1877
Kimberly v. . Patchin green
ny · 1859
1 sentence

1877They attempt to bring this case within Kimberly v. Patchin, 19 N. Y. 330 ; Waldron v. Chase, 37 Me. 414; and Riddle v. Varnum, 20 Pick. 283 .

11877–1877
Griffin v. Blanchar neutral
cal · 1860
1 sentence

1877Emison v. Whittlesy, 55 Mo. 254 ; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Durette v. Briggs, 47 Mo. 362 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 40 Mo. 90 ; Delassus v. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 212 ; Griffin v. Blanchar, 17 Cal. 70 ; 1 Ld.

11877–1877
Waldron v. Chase green
me · 1854
1 sentence

1877They attempt to bring this case within Kimberly v. Patchin, 19 N. Y. 330 ; Waldron v. Chase, 37 Me. 414; and Riddle v. Varnum, 20 Pick. 283 .

11877–1877

Where else courts name it

NY 18 (1823–2005) AL 12 (1863–1930) PA 10 (1847–1948) IL 9 (1875–2009) CT 8 (1905–2021) TX 8 (1885–1980) IN 8 (1869–1986) MO 7 (1877–1987) CA 6 (1904–1999) GA 5 (1914–1948) MD 5 (1857–1917) IA 5 (1934–2026) TN 4 (1905–1998) CO 4 (1907–1923) KS 4 (1899–1937) KY 3 (1866–1936) HI 3 (1909–1963) DC 3 (1913–2000) VA 3 (1893–1945) MI 2 (1981–1982) AR 2 (1928–1938) SD 2 (1910–2022) MN 2 (1880–1913) FL 2 (1915–1937) OK 2 (1935–1936) NV 2 (1925–1954) WI 2 (1928–1964) OH 2 (1854–2008) MT 2 (1911–1974) LA 2 (1847–1924) NC 2 (1930–1930) MS 2 (1877–1966)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check