Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
DeKalb County v. Pine Hills Civic Clubgreen2 sentences2009Id. at 349 . 8 See DeKalb County Organizational Act § 15 (veto power of the chief executive). 9 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (a) (1); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (5) (a). 10 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (b) (2); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (6). 11 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (a) (2), (a) (3); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (5) (b), (5) (c). 12 See generally DeKalb County v. Pine Hills Civic Club, 254 Ga. 20, 20-21 (1) ( 326 SE2d 214 ) (1985) (“Notice by publication of a rezoning hearing to be held by a governing authority of a county is proper and adequate insofar as the requirements of procedural due process and equal pr 2009Id. at 349 . 8 See DeKalb County Organizational Act § 15 (veto power of the chief executive). 9 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (a) (1); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (5) (a). 10 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (b) (2); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (6). 11 See OCGA § 44-10-26 (a) (2), (a) (3); DeKalb County Code § 13.5.7 (5) (b), (5) (c). 12 See generally DeKalb County v. Pine Hills Civic Club, 254 Ga. 20, 20-21 (1) ( 326 SE2d 214 ) (1985) (“Notice by publication of a rezoning hearing to be held by a governing authority of a county is proper and adequate insofar as the requirements of procedural due process and equal pr | 2 | 2 |
Atlantic Refining Company v. Spearsgreen2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 1 |
City of Cumming v. Realty Development Corp.green2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 1 |
South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. Thorntongreen2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 1 |
Golden v. Whitegreen2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 1 |
ERVIN COMPANY v. Browngreen2 sentences1997The county board of commissioners listed the zoning as conditional zoning and “OI (conditional).” When property is conditionally rezoned, the conditions include “all of those stipulations made upon the rezoning hearing and entered in the official and public minutes of the board of commissioners.” Ervin Co. v. Brown, 228 Ga. 14, 15 ( 183 SE2d 743 ) (1971). 1997The county board of commissioners listed the zoning as conditional zoning and “OI (conditional).” When property is conditionally rezoned, the conditions include “all of those stipulations made upon the rezoning hearing and entered in the official and public minutes of the board of commissioners.” Ervin Co. v. Brown, 228 Ga. 14, 15 ( 183 SE2d 743 ) (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Gheesling v. Martingreen2 sentences1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. 1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hoechstetter v. Pickens Cnty.
neutral
1 sentence2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 2025–2025 |
HOECHSTETTER v. PICKENS COUNTY
green
1 sentence2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 2025–2025 |
C & H DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. Franklin County
green
2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Tilley Properties, Inc. v. Bartow County
green
2 sentences2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T 2025Corp., 268 Ga. 461, 463-464 (3) ( 491 SE2d 60 ) (1997) (statute required another public hearing after prior remand for rezoning); Tilley Properties v. Bartow County, 261 Ga. 153 ( 401 SE2d 527 ) (1991) (zoning ordinance was void where the county failed to comply with notice required by the Zoning Procedures ); Golden v. White, 253 Ga. 111, 112 ( 316 SE2d 460 ) (1984) (“[T]he trial court correctly ruled that the attempted rezoning of appellant’s property was null and void for failure to provide proper public notice of the rezoning hearing.”) (emphasis supplied); South Jonesboro Civic Assn. v. T | 1 | 2025–2025 |
F. P. Plaza, Inc. v. Waite
green
2 sentences1987In F. P Plaza, Inc. v. Waite, 230 Ga. 161 ( 196 SE2d 141 ) (1973), cert. denied in 414 U. S. 825 , we held: “. . . notice by publication of a rezoning hearing to be held by a governing authority of a county is proper and adequate insofar as the requirements of procedural due process and equal protection are concerned.” Id. at 163-64. 1987In F. P Plaza, Inc. v. Waite, 230 Ga. 161 ( 196 SE2d 141 ) (1973), cert. denied in 414 U. S. 825 , we held: “. . . notice by publication of a rezoning hearing to be held by a governing authority of a county is proper and adequate insofar as the requirements of procedural due process and equal protection are concerned.” Id. at 163-64. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Schechter v. United States
green
1 sentence1987In F. P Plaza, Inc. v. Waite, 230 Ga. 161 ( 196 SE2d 141 ) (1973), cert. denied in 414 U. S. 825 , we held: “. . . notice by publication of a rezoning hearing to be held by a governing authority of a county is proper and adequate insofar as the requirements of procedural due process and equal protection are concerned.” Id. at 163-64. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Lawrence v. Harding
green
2 sentences1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. 1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Dixie Bearings, Inc. v. Walker
green
1 sentence1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Henderson v. Henderson
neutral
1 sentence1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
City of Atlanta v. Williams
green
2 sentences1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. 1973See, e. g., Gheesling v. Martin, 176 Ga. 738 (2) ( 168 SE 767 ); City of Atlanta v. Williams, 218 Ga. 379 (1) ( 128 SE2d 41 ); Bodziner v. Greenfield, 219 Ga. 310 ( 133 SE2d 338 ); Lawrence v. Harding, 225 Ga. 148 (2) ( 166 SE2d 336 ), and cits. *637 However, the evidence contained in this record does not warrant a permanent injunction invalidating the entire rezoning hearing. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.